Search Results for "Undisputed Refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Undisputed Refund"

310 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 310 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Recovery of Money Suit — Limitation Period for Refund of Advance Under Agreement to Sell Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, Not Article 24. Agreement to Sell Not a Bond, Hence Article 24 Inapplicable; Suit Filed Within Three Years from Date of Refusal to Execute Sale Deed Is Within Limitation.

29 Apr 2025

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for recovery of money seeking refund of an advance amount of Rs. 5,00,000 paid to the respondent-def...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excess One-Time Premium in ULC Act Repeal Case — Premium Chargeable Only on Exempted Surplus Vacant Land. The court held that the one-time premium under the 2019 GR and 2021 GR cannot be levied on retainable land, only on exempted surplus land under Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

7 Aug 2024

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.429/1/2 and CTS No.1069-A/A-1 and 1069-A/B-1, sought a refund of Rs.2,66,75,750/- paid as one-time p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Anti-Dumping Duty Notifications as Belated and Misconceived. Refund Claim for Rs. 9.24 Crore Rejected Due to Delay and Laches, as Petition Filed After Six Years from Imposition of Duty.

22 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Sansar Texturisers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two notifications dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tax Determination Under Kar Vivadh Samadhan Scheme, 1998. Certificate of tax payable set aside for non-compliance with statutory requirements under Section 90(2) of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998.

14 Jul 2023

The petitioner, The Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the legality and validity of orders passed by Respondent...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Auction Amount to Highest Bidder in Sand Block Case Due to Non-Possession and Arbitrary Denial by State. State's Failure to Give Possession and Refund Deposit Violates Article 14 and Principles of Model Litigant.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, Popatrao Vyankatrao Patil, was the highest bidder in a public auction conducted by the District Collector, Satara, for sand blocks in t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Case — Coal and Coke Held Not Same Goods Under Section 15(b) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Reimbursement of State Tax on Coal Not Available When Inter-State Sale Is of Coke, Despite Both Being Declared Goods Under Section 14.

10 May 2019

The State of Jharkhand and its officers appealed against a High Court judgment directing them to reimburse the respondent, M/s. Akash Coke Industries ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Lease Deposit Refund. Court holds that a claim for refund of a deposit is a monetary claim and cannot be secured by way of interim measure under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 unless there is a specific agreement or clear evidence of intention to create a charge.

7 May 2012

The petitioner, BNP Paribas Securities India Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Student's Petition for Refund of Fees and Return of Original Documents After Cancelling Provisional Admission to B.A.M.S. Course. Rule 10.5.2 of Health Sciences Selection Rules Mandates Full Refund When Student Is Admitted to Another Degree Course by Competent Authority in Same Academic Year.

4 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Kum. Deepali Nanasaheb Gaikwad, sought admission to Health Science courses for the academic year 2000-2001. The Maharashtra University...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Octroi on Computer Software in Classification Dispute. Software Held to Be Separate Goods from Hardware Under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 and Octroi Rules.

11 Oct 2005

The petitioner, Tata Information Systems Ltd. (now IBM Global Services India Private Limited), was engaged in the manufacture, import, sale, and marke...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)