Search Results for "State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission"

297 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 297 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Flat Possession -- NCDRC Orders Upheld for Completion, Compensation, and Costs Under Consumer Protection Act

20 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court addressed three civil appeals arising from NCDRC orders in consumer complaints filed by flat buyers against Parsvnath Developers Ltd...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case, Holding Purchase of Software for Business Expansion is Commercial Purpose. Company Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as Goods Used for Profit Generation.

13 Nov 2025

The appellant, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, filed a consumer complaint before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Del...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's Open Access Regulations in Challenge by Industrial Consumers. The Court held that the RERC has jurisdiction to regulate both intra-state and inter-state open access, and the restrictions imposed are reasonable and within the statutory framework of the Electricity Act, 2003.

1 Apr 2025

The present appeals challenge two separate orders of the Rajasthan High Court upholding the validity of the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commissio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Return of Shares and Dividends in Commercial Suit — Plaintiff Stockbroker Entitled to 11,25,000 ITC Shares and Accrued Dividends After Full Satisfaction of Debt Under One Time Settlement. Court Holds That Once Debt Is Fully Satisfied, Bank Must Return All Pledged Securities and Cannot Retain Them as Collateral for Other Debts.

10 Mar 2025

The Plaintiff, Shrikant G. Mantri, a stockbroker and registered member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, filed a commercial suit against Punjab National B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

16 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Re-Appointment of District Consumer Commission President Despite Tenure Expiry — Rules of 2020 Declared Unconstitutional, Petitioner Entitled to Consideration Under Pre-Existing Rules. The court directed the State to consider the petitioner's application for re-appointment under the Model Rules, 2012, as the Rules of 2020 were struck down as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

20 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Mrs. Suhas Milind Untwale, was appointed as President of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Buldana on 06.02.2013. U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Re-appointment of District Consumer Commission President After Unconstitutional Rules Struck Down — Petitioner Entitled to Consideration Under Pre-2020 Rules. The Court directed the State to consider the petitioner's application for re-appointment as President of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission under the Model Rules, 2012, after the Rules of 2020 were declared unconstitutional.

20 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Mrs. Suhas Milind Untwale, was appointed as President of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Buldana on 06.02.2013. A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Loan Processing Fee Refund. Bank's Circular Requiring Upfront Processing Fee Collection Held Binding on Consumer; Refund Denied to Avoid Unjust Enrichment.

14 Feb 2020

The case involves a dispute between Bank of India (appellant) and M/s. Brindavan Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. (respondent/consumer) regarding the refund ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Civil Suit for Medical Negligence Despite Prior Consumer Forum Dismissal. Principle of Res Judicata Not Applicable to Consumer Forum Decisions Under Section 9 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

15 Oct 2019

The case involves a dispute over medical negligence leading to the death of a baby boy. The respondents (parents) initially filed a complaint before t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revision Petition in Consumer Execution Proceedings. Holds that Execution is Continuation of Consumer Dispute Under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

6 May 2019

The present Civil Appeal arose out of execution proceedings initiated by the Respondent-Complainant, K. A. Nagamani, against the Appellant, Karnataka ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)