Search Results for "Section 29(4)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 29(4)"

900 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 900 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Requirement of Knowledge Under Section 25 NDPS Act for Owner's Liability. Owner's Mere Ownership of Premises Insufficient to Establish Offence Without Evidence of Knowing Permission Under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

31 Aug 2024

The petitioner, a 68-year-old man, was the owner of a property that was rented out through a property manager for a birthday party. On 20.05.2024, pol...

High Court

KAHC010306832010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Section 44C Interpretation Matter, Upholds Assessee's Claim for Full Deduction of Exclusive Expenses. Exclusive Expenditure Incurred by Head Office Solely for Indian Branches Not Governed by Section 44C Limitation, Fully Allowable Under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay examines Official Liquidator’s report for declaration of sub-lease executed by lessee as void. The matter involves sub-lease of company property during pendency of winding up, with allegations of fabricated documents.

5 May 2017

The matter concerns an Official Liquidator’s report filed in the winding up of Modi Stone Limited, seeking a declaration that a sub-lease dated 20 M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 Are Impugned.

11 Jul 2014

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Block Assessment Case on Levy of Interest and Surcharge. Interest under Section 158BFA(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld for belated filing of block period return despite notice issued under Section 158BD prior to amendment, as provision inherently incorporates Section 158BC procedure.

13 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court addressed a group of appeals concerning the levy of interest under Section 158BFA(1) and surcharge under Section 113 of the Income T...

High Court

High Court Allows Amalgamated Company's Claim for Unabsorbed Depreciation of Sick Company Under Section 32(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that unabsorbed depreciation of amalgamating company is deemed to be depreciation of amalgamated company under Section 32(6) and can be carried forward irrespective of whether amalgamating company filed returns.

7 Sep 2017

The case involves two income tax appeals filed by M/s. Ballarpur Industries Ltd. (BILT) against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur, conc...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition by Tenants in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32F(1) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act Mandates Tenant to Give Intimation Within One Year of Widow Landlady's Death; Failure to Do So Extinguishes Right to Purchase. Landlady's earlier exercise of right under Section 31(1) to resume land for personal cultivation does not dispense with the statutory requirement of notice under Section 32F(1), and non-compliance results in loss of tenancy right and possession reverting to landlord under Section 32P.

3 Jun 2019

The dispute arose from a tenancy over agricultural land in Satara district. The petitioners were tenants in possession since the tillers' day, and the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Liability of Legal Representatives in Consumer Dispute — Death of Developer Does Not Extinguish Obligations Under Development Agreement. Legal heirs of deceased developer are bound to execute all obligations under a development agreement, including monetary payments and completion of construction, as per the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

15 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by the legal representatives of a deceased developer against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Red...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)