KAHC010259352010_1
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "Section 162"
1438 result(s) found
Found 1438 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of IGST Act Provisions on Intermediary Services in Third Judge Reference. The court considered whether Section 13(8)(b) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which deems the place of supply of intermediary services as the location of the supplier, is constitutionally valid and within legislative competence.
18 Apr 2023The matter involved two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13(8)(b) and Section 8(2) of th...
- 18
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revision Order — Revisional Court Erred in Entertaining Revision Under Section 438 BNSS Against Order Under Section 164 BNSS Without Notice. Order Under Section 164 BNSS Is Summary and Not Subject to Revision; Natural Justice Violated.
15 Jun 2026The petitioner, Shri Noberto Paulo Sebastiao Fernandes, through his constituted attorney, filed a criminal writ petition before the High Court of Bomb...
- 96
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Orders in SARFAESI Proceeding. Borrowers Failed to Comply with Conditional Orders and Sale Certificate Was Already Issued to Auction Purchaser.
20 Dec 2023The case arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders of the Debts Recovery Tribuna...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.
30 Nov -0001The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...
- 181
High Court
Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.
7 Oct 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.
3 Oct 2024The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...
- 484
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance of Granted Land Subject to Non-Alienation Condition. Court Examines Whether Agreement to Sell Executed During Non-Alienation Period is Void Under Karnataka SC/ST Act, 1978.
22 Jan 2026The civil revision petition arose from an order of the trial court rejecting the petitioners' application to reject the plaint in a suit for specific ...
- 36
Supreme Court
"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"
25 Jul 2024The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...
- 508
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Registration Fee Dispute — Rule 55A of MP Motor Vehicles Rules Valid. State can charge separate fee for reserved registration numbers under Section 41(6) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
26 Aug 2020The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court judgment that had quashed Rule 55A of the Madhya Prad...
- 183
