Search Results for "Section 148 Income-tax Act"

51 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 51 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Exemption Under Section 10(38) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Invalid.

The Petitioner, General Insurance Corporation of India, a public sector general insurance company, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2006-0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material — Interest on Refund Net of Interest Paid Under Section 220 Was Fully Disclosed During Original Assessment

The petitioner, Arthur Anderson & Co., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 4 February 2009 issued b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order Allowing Settlement Application. Settlement Commission's Finding of Full and True Disclosure of Income by Assessee in Case of Alleged Bogus Purchases Upheld Under Section 245D of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order for Violation of Mandatory Procedure Under Section 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Proper Opportunity to Respond Renders Assessment Order a Nullity.

The petitioner, Madhuri Sameer Gokhale, an individual homemaker, challenged the reassessment order dated 29 March 2022 passed by the National Faceless...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Everest Kanto Cylinder Ltd., a public limited company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 30 November 2015. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in Income Tax Case for Non-Compliance with GKN Driveshafts Procedure. Revenue failed to communicate order rejecting objections and passed assessment order within four weeks, violating principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Capgemini India Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the subsequent reassessment order da...