Search Results for "Section 146"

605 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 605 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Execution Proceedings — Auction Sale Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Order 21 Rule 95 CPC. Delivery of possession is a mandatory requirement for confirmation of sale under Order 21 Rule 95 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case involves two Regular First Appeals (RFA No. 557/2016 and RFA No. 558/2016) filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rules 1 and 2 of the Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Executing Court's Decision, Rejects Jurisdictional Objections and Abuse of Process. Possession warrant stands as Appellate Bench's reversal deemed erroneous; Writ Petition allowed, reinforcing res judicata and legal precedents.

The Executing Court had issued a possession warrant on 19 April 2024, which Respondent No. 1 failed to challenge. Respondent No. 1's subsequent object...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Sets Aside Order Allowing Witness Recall, Emphasizes Expeditious Resolution of 38-Year-Old Suit. Plaintiffs successfully challenge Small Causes Court decision, highlighting undue delays and insufficient justification for recalling Defendant's witness.

The petition challenges an order by the Small Causes Court in Mumbai that allowed the Defendant's witness (DW1) to be recalled for re-examination, cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that once the cheque and signature are admitted, the presumption of a legally enforceable debt arises, and the accused must rebut it with evidence.

The appellant, Vandana Pandey, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Abhilasha Pande, al...