High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of Writ Petition (L) No. 30829 of 2024. The petition involved multiple parties including the State of Maharashtra and several private respondents.
8 May 2025...
Search Results for "Section 111(2)"
52 result(s) found
Found 52 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows PIL Seeking Scribe Facility for Person with Disability Without Benchmark Disability — Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Benchmark Disability Not a Precondition for Reasonable Accommodation in Examinations Under Sections 2(s), 2(t), 3, 16, 17, 20 of RPwD Act, 2016.
10 Feb 2025The petitioner, Gulshan Kumar, a person with 25% permanent disability due to Focal Hand Dystonia (Writer's Cramp), filed a Public Interest Litigation ...
- 832
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Post-Award Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act for Enforcement of Consent Award — Disclosure of Assets and Injunction Granted to Prevent Frustration of Award. Court Holds That Post-Award Relief Under Section 9 Is Maintainable and Orders Disclosure of Assets Under Order XXI Rule 41 CPC, Appointment of Court Receiver, and Freezing of Bank Accounts to Secure the Award Amount.
11 Aug 2021The petitioner, Tulika Devidayal, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking post-award relief to enforce ...
- 46
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tax Appeal in Part on Demurrage Disallowance and Education Cess Deduction — Demurrage paid to non-resident buyers not taxable under section 172 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as occasional shipping; Education Cess allowable as deduction in year of payment.
28 Feb 2020The judgment concerns two tax appeals filed by Sesa Goa Limited against the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 1, Panaji Goa, arising from assess...
- 35
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Intra-Court Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Declaring Ujani as Grama Panchayat Headquarter, Dispute Over Location Between Ujani and Gudapalli Under Karnataka Grama Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Single Judge had set aside Regional Commissioner's decision favoring Gudapalli, and the division bench heard arguments on the scope of judicial review over administrative headquarter fixation.
27 Feb 2019The appeal arose from a dispute regarding the location of the headquarter of a newly constituted grama panchayat comprising four villages: Ujani, Medp...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Receiver and Injunction in Loan Default Case. Loan Agreement and Mortgage by Deposit of Title Deeds Established Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 Sep 2015The petitioner, Aditya Birla Finance Limited, a non-banking finance company, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...
- 132
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Scheme of Amalgamation Without Physical Meeting in Exceptional Circumstances. Section 110 of Companies Act, 2013 Does Not Eliminate Requirement of Meeting Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956 for Scheme Approval.
8 May 2014The judgment addresses a Company Summons for Direction filed by Godrej Industries Limited (GIL) seeking approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation with Wada...
- 177
High Court
High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Company in Tender Dispute — Integrity Pact Provisions Not Attracted as Tender Was Cancelled, Not Individual Disqualification. The court held that a ban from future tenders under the Integrity Pact requires satisfaction of all conditions, including proof of cartelisation or restriction of competitiveness, which was absent when the tender itself was cancelled.
6 Feb 2014The petitioners, Techno Precision Engineers Pvt. Ltd. and its director Ram Sharan Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Indefinite Curfew Imposed Due to Burial Dispute in Mominpura Area. Court holds that curfew under Section 144 CrPC cannot be used as a permanent measure and must be proportionate to the threat.
12 Jul 2011The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The petit...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Ceiling Order Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 — Green Belt Land Inclusion Upheld. The Competent Authority's rejection of objections regarding inclusion of green belt land in the holding was affirmed, as the land was part of the urban agglomeration under Section 6(1) of the Act.
21 Mar 2006The petitioners, legal heirs of the original land owner Chandrakant Trimbakrao Rajebahadur (Respondent No.5), filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...
- 118
