High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tax Appeal in Part on Demurrage Disallowance and Education Cess Deduction — Demurrage paid to non-resident buyers not taxable under section 172 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as occasional shipping; Education Cess allowable as deduction in year of payment.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment concerns two tax appeals filed by Sesa Goa Limited against the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 1, Panaji Goa, arising from assessments for different assessment years. The appeals were heard together and disposed of by a common judgment. Tax Appeal No.17 of 2013 was admitted on three substantial questions of law: (i) whether the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of demurrage paid to non-resident buyers of iron ore was covered by the decision in Orient Goa P. Ltd., considering that the Tribunal had held the demurrage taxable under section 172; (ii) whether the claim that demurrage was not income accrued or arisen in India under section 5(2)(b) read with section 9(1)(i) was covered by the same decision; and (iii) whether Education Cess and Higher and Secondary Education Cess are allowable as deduction in the year of payment. Tax Appeal No.18 of 2013 was admitted only on the third question. The court noted that the first two questions in Tax Appeal No.17 of 2013 were covered by the earlier decision of the High Court in Orient Goa P. Ltd., which held that demurrage paid to non-resident buyers is not taxable under section 172 as occasional shipping and does not accrue or arise in India. Accordingly, those questions were answered in favor of the appellant. Regarding the third question, the court relied on its earlier decision in Sesa Goa Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, which held that Education Cess and Higher and Secondary Education Cess are allowable as deduction under section 40(a)(ii) in the year of payment. The court thus allowed the appeals in part, answering the first two questions in favor of the appellant and the third question also in favor of the appellant.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Demurrage - Section 172, Section 5(2)(b), Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - Demurrage paid to non-resident buyers - The issue was whether demurrage paid by the appellant to non-resident buyers of iron ore was taxable under section 172 as occasional shipping or as income deemed to accrue or arise in India. The court held that demurrage is not income from occasional shipping under section 172 and does not accrue or arise in India under section 5(2)(b) read with section 9(1)(i), following the decision in Orient Goa P. Ltd. (Paras 4, 7-8).

B) Income Tax - Education Cess - Section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - Allowability of Education Cess as deduction - The issue was whether Education Cess and Higher and Secondary Education Cess are allowable as deduction in the year of payment. The court held that such cess is allowable as deduction under section 40(a)(ii) in the year of payment, following the decision in Sesa Goa Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Paras 5, 9-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether demurrage paid by the appellant to non-resident buyers of iron ore is taxable under section 172 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and whether Education Cess and Higher and Secondary Education Cess are allowable as deduction in the year of payment.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed Tax Appeal No.17 of 2013 in part by answering substantial questions of law (i) and (ii) in favor of the appellant and against the respondent, and answered question (iii) in favor of the appellant. Tax Appeal No.18 of 2013 was allowed by answering the substantial question of law in favor of the appellant. The impugned orders of the Tribunal were set aside to the extent of the disallowance of demurrage and denial of Education Cess deduction.

Law Points

  • Demurrage paid to non-resident buyers is not income deemed to accrue or arise in India under section 5(2)(b) read with section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • and is not taxable under section 172 as occasional shipping
  • Education Cess and Higher and Secondary Education Cess are allowable as deduction under section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act
  • 1961 in the year of payment.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (02) 107

Tax Appeal No.17 of 2013 and Tax Appeal No.18 of 2013

2020-02-28

M. S. Sonak, Nutan D. Sardessai

2015:BHC-GOA:2033-DB

Mr. R. G. Ramani, Senior Advocate with Ms. Srushti Patil, Advocate for the Appellant; Ms. Susan Linhares, Standing Counsel for the Respondent

Sesa Goa Limited

The Joint Commissioner of Income-Tax, Range 1, Panaji Goa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Tax appeals against orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding disallowance of demurrage paid to non-resident buyers and allowability of Education Cess as deduction.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to set aside the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 of demurrage paid to non-resident buyers and to allow deduction of Education Cess and Higher and Secondary Education Cess in the year of payment.

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the Tribunal's order upholding the disallowance of demurrage and denying deduction of Education Cess.

Previous Decisions

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal had held that demurrage was taxable under section 172 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and disallowed the deduction under section 40(a)(i); the Tribunal also disallowed the deduction of Education Cess.

Issues

Whether demurrage paid to non-resident buyers of iron ore is taxable under section 172 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as occasional shipping. Whether demurrage paid to non-resident buyers is income deemed to accrue or arise in India under section 5(2)(b) read with section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Whether Education Cess and Higher and Secondary Education Cess are allowable as deduction under section 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the year of payment.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the demurrage paid to non-resident buyers is not taxable under section 172 as it is not income from occasional shipping, and does not accrue or arise in India, relying on the decision in Orient Goa P. Ltd. The appellant argued that Education Cess and Higher and Secondary Education Cess are allowable as deduction in the year of payment, relying on the decision in Sesa Goa Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax. The respondent argued that the demurrage is taxable under section 172 and that Education Cess is not allowable as deduction.

Ratio Decidendi

Demurrage paid to non-resident buyers of iron ore is not income from occasional shipping under section 172 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and does not accrue or arise in India under section 5(2)(b) read with section 9(1)(i). Education Cess and Higher and Secondary Education Cess are allowable as deduction under section 40(a)(ii) in the year of payment.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel for the parties state that both these appeals can be taken up and disposed of by a common judgment and order. In so far as the substantial questions of law Nos. (i) and (ii) in Tax Appeal No.17 of 2013 are concerned, we note that the same arise... Education Cess and Higher and Secondary Education Cess is allowable as a deduction in the year of payment.

Procedural History

The appellant filed Tax Appeal No.17 of 2013 and Tax Appeal No.18 of 2013 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa against the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeals were admitted on 23rd September 2013 on substantial questions of law. The court heard both appeals together and disposed of them by a common judgment on 28th February 2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 40(a)(i), 40(a)(ii), 5(2)(b), 9(1)(i), 172
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election Petition Under Section 15 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 — Age Dispute Not a Ground for Setting Aside Election. The Court held that an election petition under Section 15 of the...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Tax Appeal in Part on Demurrage Disallowance and Education Cess Deduction — Demurrage paid to non-resident buyers not taxable under section 172 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as occasional shipping; Education Cess allowa...