Search Results for "Rule 16"

36 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Executing Court's Decision, Rejects Jurisdictional Objections and Abuse of Process. Possession warrant stands as Appellate Bench's reversal deemed erroneous; Writ Petition allowed, reinforcing res judicata and legal precedents.

The Executing Court had issued a possession warrant on 19 April 2024, which Respondent No. 1 failed to challenge. Respondent No. 1's subsequent object...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals on Chewing Tobacco Packaging Valuation Under Central Excise Act. The Court affirms that HDPE bags sold by the respondent-assessee qualify as wholesale packages, exempting them from retail sale valuation under Section 4A of the Excise Act.

The appeals challenge the judgment dated 7th November 2008 by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, addressing whether the goods so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Tax Collection Obligation on Mysore Sales Under Section 206C. Excise Contractors Deemed "Buyers" in Karnataka Liquor Vending Case, Appeal Dismissed

The application of Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding tax collection at source on the sale of alcoholic liquor, particularly focusing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The plaintiffs' contentions, acceptance of smaller plots without protest, failure to provide evidence for damages, and the absence of guaranteed right to land allocation.

Legal dispute between the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and the plaintiffs concerning land allotment and compensation under Town Planning Scheme No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Repealed Penalty Rule Cannot Apply: The Supreme Court Upholds Application of Amended Rule in Excise Penalty Case

The Supreme Court of India ruled in favor of Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd, holding that penalties for exceeding permissible limits of liquor wastage du...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Judicial Officer Discharged During Probation and Quashes Discharge Order. Discharge Based on Bail Order and Pending Inquiry Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice and Is Arbitrary Under Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010 and Article 233 of Constitution of India.

The dispute involved a judicial officer appointed as an Additional District Judge in 2013 under the Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010, who was d...