Search Results for "Re-determination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Re-determination"

48 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Payment of Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Directs Payment Upon Furnishing Bank Guarantee Despite Pending Appeal by Acquiring Body.

14 Feb 2014

The petitioners, owners of land acquired for the Neera Deoghar Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, sought a writ of mandamus directing the S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Disposal of Section 28A Applications Despite Pending Appeals in Land Acquisition Case. Landowners' Applications for Redetermination of Compensation Cannot Be Kept Pending Solely Due to Pendency of State's Appeals Against Reference Court Award.

7 Feb 2014

The petitioners were owners of lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. An award under Section 11 was made in 1988. In 1999, they filed ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Market Value Determination for Share Valuation in Oppression Case — Director's Rights Cease Upon Valuation. The court held that the market value determined by the Company Law Board for shares held by a minority shareholder was just and proper, and that the shareholder ceases to be a director upon valuation, not upon payment.

16 Jun 2005

The case involves two appeals filed against an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 5.5.2003 in Company Petition No. 12 of 1998. The appellant, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Rental Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Petitioner entitled to rental compensation from date of possession till award under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for land taken for octroi post.

6 Apr 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Devi Construction LLP, owned lands in survey Nos.10 (part), 11 (part) and 160 (part) of Village Wakad, Taluka Mulshi, Dist. Pune,...

High Court

Court Upholds Final Partition Decree, Dismisses Late Will Submission by Defendant No.8 Defendant's attempt to modify shares based on a newly surfaced Will rejected; court emphasizes finality of judicial proceedings.

1 Jul 2024

This Writ Petition challenges the rejection of Defendant No.8's application by the Joint Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nashik, which sought to frame ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. The court held that mere denial of service without evidence is insufficient to set aside an ex-parte decree under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

22 Mar 2024

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original defendant Kadappa, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Section 28A Application for Enhanced Compensation — Land Acquisition Officer's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Limitation Provisions. The court held that the application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was within limitation and the rejection without hearing violated natural justice.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioners, legal heirs of Balwant Kannav, challenged the order dated 31.03.1999 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Yavatmal, reject...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses SLP of Landowner Seeking Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Collector's Order Not Vitiated as Petitioner Failed to Inform About Pending Appeals and Did Not Seek Reference Under Section 28A(3). The Court held that the principle in Babua Ram v. State of U.P. requiring the Collector to await final appellate decree applies only when the Collector is aware of pending appeals; here, the Collector acted in good faith.

26 Feb 2019

The case involves a challenge by M/s. Model Economic Township Ltd. (petitioner) against the dismissal of its writ petition by the Punjab and Haryana H...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Section 28A Application in Land Acquisition Case — Petitioner Failed to Pursue Reference Under Section 18 Diligently, Resulting in Dismissal for Non-Payment of Court Fees.

13 Feb 2017

The petitioner, Shri Annasaheb Tulsiram Kharat, owned land at Village Mirgavan, Taluka Karmala, District Solapur, which was acquired for the Sina-Kole...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Redetermination Under Section 28(A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Limitation Period Computed from Date of Knowledge of Award. Petitioners' application for redetermination of compensation held within limitation as time runs from date of knowledge of the award, not from the date of award.

25 Jan 2012

The petitioners, whose lands were acquired for the Mukane Dam Project, sought redetermination of compensation under Section 28(A) of the Land Acquisit...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)