Search Results for "Proportionate Area"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Proportionate Area"

566 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 566 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case for Katpur Dam — Market Value Determined at Rs. 450 per Square Metre Based on Sale Instances and Potentiality of Land. The court upheld the Reference Court's award for claimant No.1 but modified the award for claimant No.2 to the same rate, dismissing the claimants' cross-objection for enhancement.

4 Jun 2019

The State of Maharashtra and the Acquiring Body (Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Latur) filed First Appeal No. 1094 of 2002 against the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

10 Jul 2024

The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Acquired House Based on Expert Evidence. Reference Court's award of Rs. 6 per sq. ft. for built-up area and Rs. 3 per sq. ft. for open space upheld as just and proper under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

7 Mar 2011

The appellant, Masaji s/o Gyanoji Thoke, owned and possessed House No. 133 in village Borja, Taluka Kalamnuri, District Parbhani. The house was acquir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Peon for Habitual Absence in Disciplinary Proceedings. Administrative Appeal Dismissed as Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Absence and Disobeyed Transfer Orders.

20 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Vikas Sureshrao Waghmare, was appointed as a Peon in the District Court, Ahmednagar on 11.10.2001 and was made permanent from 18.04.20...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Public Interest Litigation Challenging Allotment of Plots to Cooperative Housing Societies of Judges; Finds Delay and No Illegality. Allotment at Ready Reckoner Rate and Change of Reservation Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Held Valid; No Favouritism Shown to Judges.

22 Nov 2012

This Public Interest Litigation, filed on 3 March 2011, challenged the allotment of government land to two cooperative housing societies whose members...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal for Full Deduction of Roof Repair Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Expenditure incurred by tenant on replacement of common roof held to be revenue expenditure allowable in entirety as commercial expediency.

30 Aug 2010

The appellant, Danesh A. Irani, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (IT...

High Court

Bombay High Court Revisits Land Allotment Dispute Between Project Affected Persons Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 After Remand. The Court Determines the Validity of Deputy Collector's Orders Dated 02.01.2020 and 17.02.2020 on Merits After Supreme Court Set Aside Previous High Court Order.

26 Jul 2023

The dispute arose between two sets of project affected persons under the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999, both claiming ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Burden of Proof Not Discharged. Appellant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as evidence of comparable sales was not properly established.

10 Jun 2010

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Benjamin Pereira against the judgment and award dated 17th November 2006 passed by the Learned District Judge,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against Bombay High Court Order Directing Grant of Amenity TDR for Garden Development. High Court Allowed Writ Petition Challenging BMC's Denial of TDR and Directed Grant of Additional Amenity TDR Under Section 126 of MRTP Act.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute centers on the entitlement to additional amenity Transferable Development Rights (TDR) for a garden developed on land reserved for a publi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeals Against Reference Court's Compensation Award in Land Acquisition Cases. Enhancement of Compensation for Irrigated Agricultural Lands Based on Comparable Sale Instances under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

11 Jan 2010

The judgment arose from a group of first appeals filed by land owners challenging the compensation awarded by the Reference Court for agricultural lan...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)