Search Results for "Premature challenge"

669 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 669 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026

The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of IT Rules Amendment on Fake News in Reference Opinion — Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of IT Rules, 2021 Held Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000.

The present proceedings arise from a reference made under Chapter-I Rule 7 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 read with Section 98 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Dismisses Writ Petition Against Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order Upholding Lokayukta Enquiry. Court Holds That Challenge to Entrustment of Departmental Enquiry is Premature and Petitioner Can Raise All Contentions After Enquiry Concludes.

The dispute arose from an illegal construction on a civic amenity site under the Mullamari Irrigation Project. In 2007, Smt. Mahananda, an allottee, b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award of Rs.29,51,000 with 12% Interest for Breach of Contract Relating to Free Commercial Time Banking Policy.

The petitioners, M/s. Media Masters and its partner, challenged an arbitral award dated 13th March, 2009 passed by a Sole Arbitrator. The award allowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Rejecting Premature Application in Fraudulent Export Case. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Application as Premature Upheld as No Show Cause Notice Issued Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioners, M/s Petrosolv India Co. and its partner, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 13 July 2006 passed by the Settlement Commi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses IAS Officer's Challenge to Compulsory Retirement in Public Interest. Service Record Including Adverse Entries and Minor Punishment Justified Action Under Rule 16(3) of All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958.

The petitioner, Paramjeet Singh Bhogal, an IAS officer of the 1967 batch allotted to Maharashtra Cadre, challenged the order of compulsory retirement ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeals in Mining Lease Dispute – Withdrawal of Recommendation and Reservation Notifications Challenged.

These appeals arise from a common judgment of the Jharkhand High Court dated April 4, 2007, dismissing writ petitions filed by several companies engag...