Search Results for "POCSO Amendment 2019"

82 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 82 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4, 5(m) and (n) read with Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shaikh Anees, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act), Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 4, 5(m) and (n) read with Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Father-Daughter Rape Case Under IPC and POCSO Act. Minor Victim's Testimony and School Transfer Certificate Establish Age of 14, Making Consent Irrelevant and Supporting Conviction for Rape Under Sections 376 IPC and 4,6 POCSO Act.

By the present criminal appeal, the appellant, who was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Kelapur in Special Case No.28/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 IPC and 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Sri Paramesha, was convicted by the Additional Sessions and Special Judge, Hassan in Special Case No.146/2014 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Age Determination. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC set aside as victim's age not proved beyond reasonable doubt and medical evidence inconsistent with alleged rape.

The appellant, Manikanta @ Puli, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru, in Spl.C.(PCSOA) No.10/2017 for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Enhancement of Sentence in POCSO Case Due to Procedural Violation — High Court's Suo Motu Enhancement Without Notice Held Illegal. Enhancement of Sentence from 7 to 10 Years in Accused's Own Appeal Violates Section 386 Proviso CrPC and Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, Kumar Ghimirey, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act, 2012) under Section 9/10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Consent of Minor Victim Not Valid, but Prosecution Failed to Prove Penetrative Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ketan Sanjay Kokate, was convicted by the Special Judge, POCSO, Pune for offences under Section 376 IPC and Section 3 punishable under ...