Search Results for "Open General Licence"

1056 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1056 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Single L-1BF License for Imported Foreign Liquor in Haryana — Rule 24(i-eeee) Held Ultra Vires Punjab Excise Act, 1914. State Government's Exclusive Power Under Section 58(2)(e) to Regulate Licenses in Local Areas Cannot Be Delegated to Financial Commissioner.

The appellant, International Spirits and Wines Association of India, challenged Rule 24(i-eeee) of the Haryana Liquor License Rules, 1970, as amended ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Delivers Judgment on Appeals Concerning Locus Standi of Third-Party Residents in Excise Licence Cases. Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition When Alternate Remedy Exists Under Bombay Prohibition (Closure of Licence) Order, 2003.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court in a writ petition filed by three local residents challenging the State G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Circulars Restricting Repairers from Collecting Verification Fees Under Legal Metrology Act — Circulars Issued Without Authority of Law and Contrary to Statutory Provisions

The petitioners, five proprietary firms engaged in the business of repairing weights, measures, and scales, held valid repairing licences issued under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by NGOs Challenging Revocation of Allotment of Gymnasium Centres by MCGM — No Right to Continue in Possession After Expiry of Licence Period

The Appellants, two NGOs, were allotted Gymnasium Centres by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) on caretaker basis for fixed periods. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...