Search Results for "Mining Leases"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Mining Leases"

129 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 129 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Mining Lease Renewal — Lease Deemed Expired Under Section 8A of MMDR Act, 1957. The petitioner's mining lease for iron ore in Goa expired on 22.11.2007, and the renewal application was rejected; no automatic extension under Section 8A as the lease had already expired.

8 May 2026

The petitioners, Shantilal Khushaldas & Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and its director Mukesh M. Saglani, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 05.11....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Defines Aravali Hills and Ranges for Conservation in T.N. Godavarman Case. Court adopts scientific definition based on geological and ecological criteria to prevent desertification and protect biodiversity across Delhi, Haryana, Gujarat, and Rajasthan.

20 Nov 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in its inherent jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed the critical issue of defining 'Aravali Hills...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Mining Company's Challenge to Stoppage Notice Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 — Two-Year Mining Period Expired. Lease Deed Executed on 18.04.2022 Permitted Mining for Maximum Two Years or Till Stage II Approval, Whichever Earlier; Court Held That the Stoppage Notice Was Valid and No Interference Warranted.

18 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/S Minera Steel and Power Pvt. Ltd., a mining company, challenged a stoppage notice dated 08.04.2024 issued by the Deputy Conservator...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Jun 2022

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers CEC Recommendations on Sand Mining Regulations in Rajasthan - Environmental Clearance and Lease Conditions at Issue. The Court reviewed Central Empowered Committee proposals for granting environmental clearances without preconditions and amending Rule 5(4) of Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017, amidst State objections to lease terminations and penalties.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from environmental concerns over sand mining in Rajasthan, leading to litigation involving the Bajri Lease LoI Holders Welfare Socie...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Quarry Lease Applications under Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules. Petitioners sought processing of pre-2016 amendment applications under unamended rules as per Rule 8-B.

16 Aug 2019

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging endorsements issued by the Department of Mines and Geology rejecting ap...

High Court

KAHC010068412019_1

16 Aug 2019

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification. Notification dated 27.08.2008 Under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act Challenged as Ultra Vires.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)