Search Results for "Meeting Rules, 1959"

452 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 452 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus to Follow Rule 13D(2-A) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960 in Elections to Milk Union Board. Court Directs Inclusion of Petitioner Societies in Electoral Process for Mandya District Co-operative Milk Producers Societies Union Ltd.

The petitioners, three milk producers' co-operative societies registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, filed a writ petition u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Vice-President for Violation of Natural Justice and Procedural Rules under Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965. Failure to allow the petitioner to speak and absence of proper proposal and seconding rendered the motion invalid.

The petitioner, Shailesh Gabhane, was the Vice-President of Nagar Panchayat, Mohadi, elected on 19.01.2022. On 20.12.2022, nine elected councillors su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. No-confidence motion invalid as three-day notice not given to Sarpanch and motion not properly moved for voting.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. On 22.12.2023, an extraordinary meeting was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Commissioner's Order in Sarpanch Election Dispute, Restores Collector's Decision Invalidating Election. Wrongful Rejection of a Ballot Paper Where Voter's Intention Was Clear Held to Vitiate Election under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

The dispute centered on the election of the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Chaul, Alibag, under the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The election was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in No-Confidence Motion for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. Failure to Provide Three Days' Notice to Sarpanch Renders No-Confidence Motion Invalid.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. She was removed from the post by a no-confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Raman & Raman Ltd. in Stage Carriage Permit Matter, Quashing Appellate Authority's Order. Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Holds Only Administrative Power; Directions Issued Are Not Law and Cannot Affect Prior Permits.

The appellant, M/s. Raman & Raman Ltd., was one of several applicants for a stage carriage permit. The Regional Transport Authority granted the permit...