Search Results for "Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Act"

684 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 684 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Shortfall Land Due to Delay and Laches. Claim for balance land under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 rejected as application made 37 years after acquisition award and 20 years after enactment without explanation.

The petitioner, legal heir of Tatoba Rama Chavan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Barred by Delay and Laches in Project Affected Person Employment Case. Claim for Reinstatement Rejected After 27-Year Delay from Denial Letters.

The petitioner, Shri Uday Laxman Pawar, claiming to be a Project Affected Person (PAP), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Earthquake Affected Person Certificate — Tahsildar Cannot Review Civil Court Decree. Circular Issued by Collector Cannot Override Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956.

The petitioner, originally the biological son of Shankar Ramu Pawar, was given in adoption to Lalu Shivram Jadhav and his wife on 18.04.2022 through a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Writ Petition Challenging Orders Restricting Redevelopment of Cooperative Society under PWR-219 Scheme. Court frames issues regarding requirement of prior permission from Social Welfare Department for redevelopment using additional FSI/TDR.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a co-operative housing society challenging orders dated 8 June 2016 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Employment as Project Affected Person — No Enforceable Contractual Right Established. Mere recommendations or correspondence do not create a legally enforceable right to absorption in employment.

The petitioner, Balak s/o Jagan Bhagat, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking a declaration that respondent no.2 (...