Search Results for "Madhya Pradesh Arbitration Tribunal"

161 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interlocutory Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Order Rejecting Permission to File Fresh Valuation Report Is Not an Interim Award and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34.

The dispute arises from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 22.12.2003 between Dilip Timblo (appellant) and Prashant Timblo (respondent). The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

RFIRST APPEAL NO. 3732 of 2023

The High Court of Gujarat heard two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Madhya Gujarat Vij Company Limite...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Railway Construction Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitrator's Award of Compensation for Underutilization of Resources Due to Railway's Delays.

The Union of India, representing the South-East-Central Railway, appealed against an order of the District Judge, Nagpur, refusing to set aside an arb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in MSME Contract Dispute with Railways — Waiver of Section 12(5) Ineligibility Upheld. Petitioner's claim for additional wages dismissed as arbitrator's findings on facts and law were not patently illegal or against public policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Truly Pest Solution Private Limited, a Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise (MSME), was awarded a contract by the Central Railway f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Family Business Dispute. Dispute Centers on Inclusion of Agricultural Lands Held by Individual Family Members in Family Asset Separation Process.

The appeal arose from a family dispute within the Malhotra family of Pune, who owned and controlled several businesses including Weikfield Products Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Despite Prior Termination of Arbitral Mandate. Court Holds That Right to Seek Appointment Is Not Extinguished by Termination Where Dispute Remains Unresolved.

The applicant, M/s. Strongwell Construction Company, a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...