Search Results for "MSEB charges"

58 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Theft of Energy Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove Tampering or Unauthorized Use Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 39 and 44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Girish Shankarlal Ostawal and Dilip Shankarlal Ostawal by the Judicial Magistrate First Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal Order in MSEB Disciplinary Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Disciplinary Authority Failed to Supply Inquiry Report Before Imposing Penalty Despite Inquiry Officer's Exoneration.

The petitioner, Shamsundar Yashwant More, a retired employee of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), challenged the order of dismissal pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Director Convicted for Electricity Theft — Acquittal Restored Due to Lack of Evidence of Personal Involvement. Vicarious liability under Sections 39 and 44 of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 cannot be imposed without proof of direct participation or knowledge of tampering.

The appellant, Mahaveer, was a director of M/s Rushi Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd., a company in Jalana, Maharashtra. The Maharashtra State Electricity ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Matter Finally in Writ Petition Challenging MSEDCL Communication. The Court Decides the Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution with Consent of Parties After Respondents Waive Service.

The petitioners, a private limited company and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Supervisor by Maharashtra State Electricity Board. Supervisor drawing wages above Rs. 1600 per month is not a workman under Section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, hence termination valid.

The petitioner, Vasant Raghunath Tupekar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangaba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Disconnection by MSEB for Non-Payment of Dues. Public Trust's Claim of Exemption Under Section 3(1)(b) of Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958 Rejected as Trust Not Engaged in Agriculture.

The petitioners, trustees of the Bombay Gow Rakshak Trust, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, filed a writ petition u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Regarding Liability for Defects in Gas Turbine Generators. Award Deals with Claims for Damages Due to Breakdown and Repair Costs Under a Turnkey Contract.

The dispute arises from a contract between Thermax Limited (Petitioner) and Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. (Respondent) for the turnkey instal...