Search Results for "MHADA cancellation"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes State Government's Cancellation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Approvals and Directs Fresh Hearing. Inconsistencies Between Government Directives and SRA Circular Were Not Established, and Scheme Was Permitted Under New Housing Policy of 2007.

The petitioner, a developer, submitted a proposal for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme which was in the nature of a Township Development Scheme for approx...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application Seeking Section 340 CrPC Proceedings in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute for Alleged Fabrication of MHADA Affidavit. Court Finds Affidavit Was Authentic, E-filed Under Administrative Directions, and Served on All Parties, Negating Claim of Fraud on Court.

The case involved two writ petitions challenging a slum rehabilitation scheme on MHADA land in Bandra East, Mumbai. The petitioners claimed to be MHAD...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Tender Ineligibility for Hoarding Advertisement Rights; Interim Relief Continues Pending Final Decision. Writ Petition under Article 226 Challenges Declarations of Ineligibility in Tender Nos. 3 and 4 Concerning 106 Hoarding Sites in Mumbai.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Sagar Lookouts, a registered partnership firm, challenging decisions of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Trust's Appeal Challenging Cancellation of Plot Allotment — Upholds High Court's Decision Based on Subsequent Developments and Consent Terms. The Court declined to interfere as the plot had been validly allotted to another trust under a settlement approved by the High Court.

The appellant, JVPD Scheme Welfare Trust, a public charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, applied for allotment of a plot in M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Societies in Section 9 Arbitration Petitions Against Federation and Developer. Termination of Bipartite MoU and Cancellation of MHADA Layout NOC Eroded Foundation of Tripartite Development Agreement, Meriting Interim Protection from Interference.

These were two commercial arbitration petitions filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Borivali Shree Ganesh Nateshwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...