Search Results for "Karnataka Forest Department"

213 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 213 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Forest Officials for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Court Orders. Court finds no willful disobedience as the order was complied with and the petition was filed based on a mistaken belief.

The complainant, Gireesh Achar, filed a contempt petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Offence Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Karnataka Forest Act and Wildlife Protection Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of forest produce beyond reasonable doubt.

The revision petitioner, Pramod S/o Arjun Kanakupakar, was convicted by the Civil Judge & JMFC, Dandeli in C.C.No.735/2010 for offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Forest Land Dispute — Non-Compliance of Section 114(A) Notice Not Fatal at Threshold Stage. Notice under Section 114(A) of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 is procedural and not a bar to maintainability of suit for declaration and injunction.

The appellants, Sidramayya and Roopa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows State Appeal in Forest Land Conversion Case — Refund of Compulsory Deposit Ordered by Single Judge Set Aside. Deposit under Section 79A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 for conversion of forest land to non-forest purpose is not refundable upon grant of permission.

The State of Karnataka, through the Deputy Conservator of Forests and other authorities, filed a writ appeal against an order of a learned Single Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Release of Seized Minerals in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Failed to Establish Ownership and Transport Permits Were Invalid

The petitioner, a partner in Srinivasa Minerals Trading Company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Confiscated Truck in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Not Given Adequate Opportunity of Hearing. Confiscation Order Under Section 61-A of Indian Forest Act, 1927 Set Aside Due to Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, owner of a truck bearing registration number MH-30-B-2897, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...