Search Results for "KAT"

111 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 111 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Ph.D. Qualification Requirements for Technical Education Posts - Kerala Technical Education Service Rules Must Yield to AICTE Regulations - Rule 6A Invalid After 5th March 2010

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of Rule 6A of the Kerala Technical Education Service (Amendment) Rules, 2004 which provided exemptions from P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Endorsement Denying Permanent Ownership of Leased Land. Petitioner's mother was lessee under South Canara District Lease of Lands for Cultivation Rules, 1957; court held that the petitioner as legal heir is entitled to seek permanent ownership.

The petitioner, Mr. Gunapal Athikari, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an endorsement dated 27.1.2018 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Form 7-A Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act — Petitioner Failed to Prove Tenancy Rights. The Court Held That the Burden of Proof Lies on the Claimant and Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Disturbed in Writ Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Smt. Machi Poojarthi, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 09.02.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Despite Completion of Work. Clause 21 of Agreement dated 05/09/1988 constitutes valid arbitration agreement under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Srinivasa Construction (a registered partnership firm) and its partners, filed a petition under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging KAT Order in Regularization Case — Petitioner Not Entitled to Regularization as Appointment Was Not Through Regular Selection Process.

The petitioner, Smt. V.S. Krithika, was working as a Typist in the Office of the Director of Lokashikshana, Bangalore. She claimed that after the Supr...