KAHC010100302020_1
2 Dec 2021The petitioners, a group of renewable energy companies, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before t...
Search Results for "Industrial Entities"
482 result(s) found
Found 482 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Tribunal's Rejection of Reference on Regularisation of Contract Labour. Held That Dispute Regarding Regularisation of Contract Labour Is an Industrial Dispute Under Section 2A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Tribunal Must Decide on Merits.
28 Apr 2023The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by a trade union and individual workmen against M/s. Exide Industries Ltd. The petitioners challenge...
- 66
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Formaldehyde Manufacturing Units to Operate Without Prior Environmental Clearance Where Consent to Establish and Operate Were Granted by Pollution Control Board. The Court Held That Units Cannot Be Closed for Want of Prior EC When the PCB Itself Was Unaware of the Requirement and the Units Had Applied for EC Within the Stipulated Period.
6 May 2026The Supreme Court allowed appeals by formaldehyde manufacturing units against the National Green Tribunal's order directing closure for want of prior ...
- 470
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification on Mining Leases; Examines Legislative Competence under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the validity of Notification No. FEE/23/2007-08 dated 16.08.2008 is...
- 61
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Three Establishments Denied Exemption Under Employees' Provident Funds Act. Functional Integrality and Common Ownership with Parent Company Preclude Claim of New Establishment Status Under Section 16(1)(d).
12 Sep 2019The Supreme Court dismissed three civil appeals filed by M/s. Shree Vishal Printers Ltd., Jaipur (SVPL), M/s. Times Publishing House Ltd., Jaipur (TPH...
- 172
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
6 Nov 2025The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a com...
- 106
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission's Open Access Regulations in Challenge by Industrial Consumers. The Court held that the RERC has jurisdiction to regulate both intra-state and inter-state open access, and the restrictions imposed are reasonable and within the statutory framework of the Electricity Act, 2003.
1 Apr 2025The present appeals challenge two separate orders of the Rajasthan High Court upholding the validity of the Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commissio...
- 604
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.
16 Apr 2024The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...
- 59
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part and Refers Question of Law to Larger Bench in MSMED Act Dispute. Registration Under Section 8 of MSMED Act, 2006 Not a Precondition for Reference Under Section 18, but Issue Requires Authoritative Determination by Three-Judge Bench.
1 Jan 2025The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by NBCC (India) Ltd. against the State of West Bengal and others, concerning a dispute with M/s Saket Infra...
- 1451
