Search Results for "Grama Panchayat Member"

74 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President and Vice President. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any illegality or procedural irregularity.

The petitioners, Smt. Honnamma and Sri Basavaraj Shivanappa Bangari, who were the President and Vice President respectively of Ganadahal Gram Panchaya...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Election Petition Challenging Disqualification Under Section 12(h) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 — Petitioner's Interest in Panchayat Work Not Proved

The petitioner, Sri B T Kumar, filed an election petition under the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 challenging the election of resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions of Anganawadi Workers Challenging Removal for Being Grama Panchayat Members. Membership in Grama Panchayat Not a Disqualification Under ICDS Guidelines, Removal Orders Quashed.

The petitioners, Smt. Prameela C K and Smt. Kendamma H S, were Anganawadi Workers appointed under the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) sch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Disqualification of Taluk Panchayat Member in Election Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Not Served. Disqualification under Section 12(1) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 set aside due to lack of opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, Smt. Palakshamma, was elected as a Taluk Panchayat Member of Davangere Taluk Panchayat. On 12.11.2013, one Sri. Chinnasamudra Shekar N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Adhyaksha for Violation of Mandatory Debate Requirement. Failure to Allow Debate Under Rule 3(3) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayat) Rules, 1994 Renders Motion Invalid.

The petitioner, H.N. Nagaveni, was elected as Adhyaksha (President) of Palagatti Grama Panchayat on 17.12.2012. On 21.12.2013, 15 members of the Panch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Consideration of Representation to Adjourn No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President — Petitioners Who Signed Notice Cannot Withdraw Support Without Proper Procedure

The petitioners, Sri T. Rajakumar Naik and Smt. Gangamma, were elected members of Kanchipura Gram Panchayat in May 2010. On 30.12.2013, 14 members, in...