High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions of Anganawadi Workers Challenging Removal for Being Grama Panchayat Members. Membership in Grama Panchayat Not a Disqualification Under ICDS Guidelines, Removal Orders Quashed.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Smt. Prameela C K and Smt. Kendamma H S, were Anganawadi Workers appointed under the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) scheme. They were removed from service by orders dated 9.6.2016 passed by the Deputy Director, Department of Women and Child Development (Respondent No.3), on the ground that they continued to be members of the Grama Panchayat. The petitioners challenged these orders by filing writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka. The court heard the matter and perused the records. The court observed that there was no provision in the ICDS guidelines or any other rule that disqualified an Anganawadi Worker from being a member of the Grama Panchayat. The court noted that the removal orders were based on a ground not supported by any legal provision. Consequently, the court held that the impugned orders were without authority of law and liable to be quashed. The court allowed the writ petitions and set aside the orders of removal dated 9.6.2016. The court directed that the petitioners be reinstated as Anganawadi Workers with continuity of service and all consequential benefits.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Anganawadi Worker - Disqualification - Membership in Grama Panchayat - The issue was whether an Anganawadi Worker could be removed from service for being a member of the Grama Panchayat. The court held that there is no provision in the ICDS guidelines or any other rule disqualifying an Anganawadi Worker from being a member of the Grama Panchayat. The removal orders were quashed. (Paras 2-3)

B) Constitutional Law - Articles 226 and 227 - Writ Jurisdiction - The court exercised its writ jurisdiction to quash the orders of removal passed by the Deputy Director, Department of Women and Child Development, as they were without authority of law. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an Anganawadi Worker can be removed from service solely on the ground of being a member of the Grama Panchayat.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petitions and quashed the orders dated 9.6.2016 passed by the Deputy Director, Department of Women and Child Development. The court directed that the petitioners be reinstated as Anganawadi Workers with continuity of service and all consequential benefits.

Law Points

  • Anganawadi Worker
  • Grama Panchayat Member
  • Disqualification
  • ICDS Guidelines
  • Removal
  • Natural Justice
  • Writ Jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (01) 13

W.P.No.42516/2016 and W.P.No.43313/2016 (S-DIS)

2017-01-05

Aravind Kumar

Sri. Sharath S Gowda (for petitioners), Sri. E.S. Indiresh, AGA (for respondents)

Smt. Prameela C K and Smt. Kendamma H S

State of Karnataka, Department of Women and Child Development, and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging removal of Anganawadi Workers from service.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of removal orders dated 9.6.2016 and reinstatement with continuity of service and consequential benefits.

Filing Reason

The petitioners were removed from service as Anganawadi Workers on the ground that they continued to be members of the Grama Panchayat.

Issues

Whether an Anganawadi Worker can be removed from service for being a member of the Grama Panchayat.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that there is no provision disqualifying an Anganawadi Worker from being a member of the Grama Panchayat. Respondents argued that the removal was justified as per the ICDS guidelines.

Ratio Decidendi

There is no provision in the ICDS guidelines or any other rule that disqualifies an Anganawadi Worker from being a member of the Grama Panchayat. Therefore, removal on that ground is without authority of law.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard. Perused the records. The impugned orders are quashed. The petitioners are directed to be reinstated as Anganawadi Workers with continuity of service and all consequential benefits.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the removal orders dated 9.6.2016 passed by the Deputy Director, Department of Women and Child Development.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Disposes Transfer Petition by Mutual Settlement and Dissolves Marriage Under Article 142. Parties Agree to Withdraw All Cases Including Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Probationary Teacher - Termination of Probationer Without Stigma Does Not Require Show Cause Notice or Enquiry Under MEPS Act.