Karnataka High Court Quashes Disqualification of Taluk Panchayat Member in Election Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Not Served. Disqualification under Section 12(1) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 set aside due to lack of opportunity of hearing.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Palakshamma, was elected as a Taluk Panchayat Member of Davangere Taluk Panchayat. On 12.11.2013, one Sri. Chinnasamudra Shekar Naik filed a complaint before the Karnataka State Election Commission alleging that ever since the petitioner became a member, her husband G.N. Sangappa and her brother H.B. Shivamurthy were repeatedly being given contracts for carrying out works under the Gram Panchayat. Based on this complaint, the Election Commission passed an order dated 13.02.2015 disqualifying the petitioner as a Taluk Panchayat Member. The petitioner challenged this order by filing a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, primarily on the ground that she was not served with any show cause notice before the order of disqualification was passed, thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The court examined the records and found that the petitioner had not been given any opportunity of hearing. The court held that the impugned order was passed in gross violation of natural justice and could not be sustained. Consequently, the court quashed the order dated 13.02.2015 and remitted the matter back to the Karnataka State Election Commission for fresh consideration, directing that the petitioner be issued a show cause notice and be given an opportunity of hearing before any order is passed.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Natural Justice - Right to be Heard - Show Cause Notice - Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, Section 12(1) - The petitioner was disqualified as Taluk Panchayat Member without being served a show cause notice. The court held that the order violated principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not given an opportunity to explain. The impugned order was quashed and the matter remitted back for fresh consideration after issuing notice to the petitioner. (Paras 3-5)

B) Election Law - Disqualification of Member - Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, Section 12(1) - The complaint alleged that the petitioner's husband and brother were repeatedly given contracts. The Election Commission disqualified the petitioner without notice. The court found that the order was passed in violation of natural justice and set it aside. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of disqualification passed by the Karnataka State Election Commission without serving a show cause notice to the petitioner is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 13.02.2015 passed by the Karnataka State Election Commission is quashed. The matter is remitted back to the Karnataka State Election Commission for fresh consideration. The petitioner shall be issued a show cause notice and be given an opportunity of hearing before any order is passed.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Right to be heard
  • Show cause notice
  • Disqualification of elected member
  • Section 12(1) Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act
  • 1993
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (06) 32

Writ Petition No.8194/2015 (LB-ELE)

2015-06-11

Raghvendra.S.Chauhan

M. Aswathanarayana Reddy (for petitioner), Aswathappa (AGA for respondent)

Smt. Palakshamma

The Karnataka State Election Commission and Sri. Chinnasamudra Shekar Naik

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging disqualification order passed by Karnataka State Election Commission

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 13.02.2015 disqualifying petitioner as Taluk Panchayat Member

Filing Reason

Petitioner was disqualified without being served a show cause notice, violating natural justice

Previous Decisions

Karnataka State Election Commission passed order dated 13.02.2015 disqualifying petitioner

Issues

Whether the order of disqualification passed without serving a show cause notice is sustainable in law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she was not served with any show cause notice before the order of disqualification was passed, violating principles of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi

An order of disqualification passed without issuing a show cause notice and without giving an opportunity of hearing is in gross violation of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has not been served with any show cause notice before the order of disqualification was passed. The impugned order has been passed in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. The order dated 13.02.2015 is quashed. The matter is remitted back to the Karnataka State Election Commission for fresh consideration.

Procedural History

On 12.11.2013, a complaint was filed against the petitioner before the Karnataka State Election Commission. The Commission passed an order dated 13.02.2015 disqualifying the petitioner. The petitioner filed a writ petition on 11.06.2015 challenging the order.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: Section 12(1)
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals of Guest Faculty in Jan Bhagidari Scheme - Ad Hoc Employees Cannot Be Replaced by Other Ad Hoc Employees. The court held that guest faculty appointed under the Jan Bhagidari Scheme are ad hoc employees entitled to ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute — Dispute Under Section 91 of MCS Act Maintainable Against Expulsion Under Section 35. Cooperative Court Has Jurisdiction to Decide Validity of Expulsion Resolution, Remedy Under Sectio...