Search Results for "Food Analyst"

142 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 142 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Revision Petitioner in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by M. Ajithkumar, the proprietor of Swasthik Trading Company, challenging his conviction under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Acquittal of partners and manufacturing chemist upheld as prosecution failed to establish manufacturing link and compliance with sampling rules.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four respondents (Laxmichand Nagaji Jain, Jeetendra Nagaji Jain, Chaburao Sampatrao Nagre, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting of Drug Manufacturer for Supplying Sub-Standard Cream Due to Reliance on Erroneous Test Report. Appellate Lab Report Under Section 25(4) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Held Conclusive, Ignoring It Renders Decision Perverse.

The appellant, Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd., supplied Clotrimazole Cream 1% 15 gm tubes to the respondent, Post Graduate Institute of Medica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Failure to Follow Rule 14 and Rule 22 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Santosh Dattatreya Mamidwar, the accused, challenging his conviction under the Prevention o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case — Mineral Oil as Foreign Matter Must Exceed 3% Limit Under Rule 44AAA. Clause A.05.17 of Appendix B to Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 permits extraneous matter up to 3% by weight, and mineral oil falls within that category.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Mangala Badkhal, proprietor of M/s. Sweta Spices Industries, for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision of Accused in Food Adulteration Case — Groundnut Oil Sample Found Adulterated. Accused Failed to Prove Due Diligence Under Section 19(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Kantilal Parasmal Jain, the original accused, challenging his conviction under Section 7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Food Adulteration Case — Lack of Specific Allegations of Consent or Neglect. Directors Cannot Be Vicariously Liable Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Without Clear Averments of Their Role in the Offence.

The applicants, who are directors of M/s. Bunge India Private Limited, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedur...