Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Food Business Operators in Lozenges Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling and Analysis Procedures Under FSS Act, 2006. The Court held that failure to follow Sections 42 and 43 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 vitiated the proceedings.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a criminal application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the applicants, who are the original accused, seeking quashing of the order issuing summons dated 13.11.2013 in Regular Criminal Case No. 4376 of 2013 and the complaint itself. The complaint was filed by the Food Safety Officer (respondent No.1) against the applicants for alleged contravention of Section 26(1) read with Section 26(2)(i) read with Section 27(1) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSS Act) and Regulation 3.1.2(7) of the Food Products (Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011. The background facts reveal that on 17.11.2012, the Food Safety Officer visited the premises of M/s. V. K. Agencies owned by applicant No.1 and discovered 200 wholesale packs of lozenges. Samples were taken and the rest of the stock was seized. The samples were sent to the Food Analyst on 19.11.2012, and a report was received. The complaint was thereafter filed. The applicants challenged the proceedings on the ground that the mandatory procedures under Sections 42 and 43 of the FSS Act, 2006 were not followed. The Court analyzed the provisions and found that the Food Safety Officer did not comply with the requirements of sending the sample to a notified laboratory and providing the accused with an opportunity to have the sample analyzed by a referral laboratory. The Court held that the non-compliance with these mandatory procedures vitiated the complaint and the summons. The Court further observed that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. Accordingly, the Court allowed the application and quashed the complaint and the order issuing summons.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of Complaint - Section 482 CrPC - Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - The High Court examined the validity of a criminal complaint filed for alleged contravention of Sections 26(1), 26(2)(i), 27(1) of the FSS Act, 2006 read with Regulation 3.1.2(7) of the Food Products (Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011. The complaint was based on sampling of lozenges by the Food Safety Officer. The Court held that the mandatory procedures under Sections 42 and 43 of the FSS Act, 2006 regarding sampling, analysis, and providing an opportunity to the accused were not complied with, rendering the complaint and the subsequent summons liable to be quashed. (Paras 1-10)

B) Food Safety - Sampling and Analysis - Sections 42, 43 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - The Court noted that the Food Safety Officer failed to follow the prescribed procedure for sampling and analysis, including the requirement to send the sample to a notified laboratory and to provide the accused with a copy of the analysis report and an opportunity to have the sample analyzed by a referral laboratory. The non-compliance vitiated the entire proceedings. (Paras 5-8)

C) Criminal Procedure - Abuse of Process - Section 482 CrPC - The Court found that the continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law as the mandatory statutory safeguards were ignored. Consequently, the complaint and the order issuing summons were quashed. (Paras 9-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the criminal complaint and the order issuing summons against the applicants under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and the Regulations thereunder are liable to be quashed on the ground of non-compliance with mandatory procedures relating to sampling, analysis, and grant of opportunity under Section 42 and 43 of the FSS Act, 2006?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the criminal application and quashed the order issuing summons dated 13.11.2013 in Regular Criminal Case No. 4376 of 2013 and the complaint itself.

Law Points

  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Section 26(1) read with Section 26(2)(i) read with Section 27(1) of the Food Safety and Standards Act
  • 2006
  • Regulation 3.1.2(7) of the Food Products (Standards and Food Additives) Regulations
  • 2011
  • Rule 2.4.1(4) and 2.4.5 of the Regulations
  • Section 42 of the FSS Act
  • Section 43 of the FSS Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (09) 152

Criminal Application (APL) No. 490 of 2016

2023-09-26

G. A. Sanap, J.

2023:BHC-NAG:14088

Mr. S. V. Manohar, Sr. Advocate assisted by Adv. Akshay Naik and Adv. Y. N. Sambre for the applicants; Mr. Amit Chutke, APP for the non-applicants/State

Kaushik Keshavlal Lakhani, Rajendra K. Rajput, M/s. Nestle India Limited, Dilipkumar Narbherambhai Kotadiya, M/s. Makson Pharmaceutical (I) Pvt. Ltd.

The State of Maharashtra, Designated Officer and Assistant Commissioner, Food and Drugs Administration (M.S.), Nagpur, The Joint Commissioner, (Food) Headquarter, Food and Drug Administration, Maharashtra State, The State of Maharashtra, Department of Food and Drugs Administration

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of criminal complaint and order issuing summons.

Remedy Sought

The applicants (original accused) sought quashing of the order issuing summons dated 13.11.2013 in Regular Criminal Case No. 4376 of 2013 and the complaint itself.

Filing Reason

The complaint was filed by the Food Safety Officer for alleged contravention of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Regulations thereunder, but the applicants contended that mandatory procedures under Sections 42 and 43 of the Act were not followed.

Previous Decisions

The learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur had issued summons on 13.11.2013 in Regular Criminal Case No. 4376 of 2013.

Issues

Whether the criminal complaint and the order issuing summons are liable to be quashed due to non-compliance with mandatory procedures under Sections 42 and 43 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006? Whether the continuation of the criminal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law?

Submissions/Arguments

The applicants argued that the Food Safety Officer did not follow the mandatory procedure for sampling and analysis as required under Sections 42 and 43 of the FSS Act, 2006, and therefore the complaint and summons should be quashed. The State/respondents argued that the procedures were complied with and the complaint was maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The mandatory procedures under Sections 42 and 43 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 regarding sampling, analysis, and providing an opportunity to the accused are essential for a valid prosecution. Non-compliance with these procedures renders the complaint and the subsequent proceedings liable to be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 as an abuse of the process of law.

Judgment Excerpts

In this criminal application, filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 the applicants (original accused) have prayed for quashing and setting aside the order issuing summons dated 13.11.2013 in Regular Criminal Case No. 4376 of 2013 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur and also for quashing and setting aside the complaint bearing Regular Criminal Case No. 4376 of 2013. The Court held that the mandatory procedures under Sections 42 and 43 of the FSS Act, 2006 were not complied with, rendering the complaint and the subsequent summons liable to be quashed.

Procedural History

The complaint was filed by the Food Safety Officer on 17.11.2012 after sampling lozenges. The sample was sent to the Food Analyst on 19.11.2012. The complaint was registered as Regular Criminal Case No. 4376 of 2013, and summons were issued on 13.11.2013. The applicants filed the present criminal application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the complaint and summons. The High Court reserved judgment on 26.07.2023 and pronounced it on 26.09.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006: 26(1), 26(2)(i), 27(1), 42, 43
  • Food Products (Standards and Food Additives) Regulations, 2011: 3.1.2(7)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Food Business Operators in Lozenges Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling and Analysis Procedures Under FSS Act, 2006. The Court held that failure to follow Sections 42 and 43 of the F...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Patent Illegality. Denial of opportunity to cross-examine key witness and failure to consider crucial evidence renders award liable to be...