Search Results for "Continuing breach"

1181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Convicts Directors for Default in Filing Statement of Affairs Under Section 454(5) of Companies Act, 1956 — Failure to Submit Statement Despite Repeated Court Orders and Notices Constitutes Offence Without Reasonable Excuse.

The Official Liquidator of M/s. Geeta Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a complaint under Section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 against four accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation for Breach of Status Quo Order in Property Dispute — District Judge's Order to Pay Rs.1,00,000/- Upheld as Proportionate Penalty for Violation of Interim Injunction Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC.

The petitioner, Hasan Ali Bohra, was the defendant No.3 in a civil suit filed by respondent No.1, Sindhutai Dabhade, seeking a declaration that a sale...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs State to Complete Land Acquisition and Pay Compensation After 30-Year Delay -- Systemic Negligence in Land Acquisition Process Addressed in Writ Petition

The petitioners, landowners from Beed district, filed a writ petition after their lands were taken into possession in 1996 for a village tank project,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Contract Breach Case — No Binding Contract Without Work Order. Mere acceptance of tender does not create contractual obligations; formal work order essential under tender conditions.

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.99/2009, whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Condominium Against Developer for Declaration of Rights Over Adjoining Plots as Barred by Limitation. Claims for Easement and Right of Way Held Time-Barred Under Articles 25, 65, and 113 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Plaintiffs, Beach Towers Condominium and its President, filed a suit in 2012 seeking declarations that they have a right of way and easement over ...