Search Results for "Collector's suo motu power"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Collector's suo motu power"

381 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 381 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Land Ceiling Case Due to Limitation Bar. Suo Moto Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Initiated After 17 Years Held Without Jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Madhavrao Laxmanrao Karhale, a resident of Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Ceiling Act Revision Order — Landlord's Surplus Land Declaration Confirmed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Valid Despite Lack of Notice to Landlord.

2 Aug 2005

The appellant, Vilas Ratanchand Shah, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment dated 31st August 1998 in Writ Petition No.2475 of 1980, whic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Dispute Case — Holds Magistrate Can Order Further Investigation Post-Cognizance Under Section 173(8) CrPC. The Court clarified that the power to order further investigation is not extinguished by filing of charge-sheet or taking of cognizance, and can be exercised before commencement of trial.

16 Oct 2019

The case arises from an FIR lodged on 22.12.2009 by Nitinbhai Mangubhai Patel, Power-of-Attorney holder of Ramanbhai Bhagubhai Patel and Shankarbhai B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Appellate Order Exceeding Jurisdiction in Stamp Duty Adjudication — Appellate Authority Cannot Set Aside Unchallenged Part of Order in Favour of Appellant Without Hearing. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority under Section 53(1A) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 exceeded its jurisdiction by setting aside a favourable part of the Collector's order not challenged by any party, violating principles of natural justice.

6 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Saryu Properties and Hotels Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in hospitality business owning two hotels in Mumbai, filed a writ petition ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Mutation Entry for Land Purchased from Public Trust. Mutation entry No.8930 restored as Assistant Collector lacked jurisdiction to cancel it without notice and without challenging the sale deed.

19 Jan 2010

The petitioners, Digambar Hiraman Saraf and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging an order dated 24.12.1990...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Commissioner's Jurisdiction Under Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Commissioner Cannot Entertain Appeal Against Collector's Refusal to Disqualify Under Section 14B.

17 Dec 2020

The petitioners, Mrs. Shobhabai Narayan Shinde and Mrs. Sunita Nana Bhil, filed separate writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suo Motu Revision Order Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Initiated After 48 Years — Unreasonable Delay and Lack of Notice Vitiate Proceedings. The court held that the power of suo motu revision must be exercised within a reasonable period, and a delay of 48 years is unreasonable; further, the order passed without notice to the grantee violates natural justice and is void.

9 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Mr. Ramakrishna M, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Tenant Purchaser in Deity Land Sale Dispute. Upholds Sale to Tenant Despite Higher Offer from Intervenors, Holding That Registered Sale Deeds Cannot Be Ignored and Tenancy Status Was Not Challenged.

17 Sep 2019

The case involves a dispute over the sale of land belonging to the deity Sri Rama Laxman Sita Swamy Bije, managed by a fit person. The fit person soug...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order in Land Grant Cancellation Case Due to Inordinate 46-Year Delay. The Court held that the exercise of revisional power under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 must be within a reasonable time, and the cancellation of revenue entries after more than four decades was unsustainable, particularly when the original grant had never been challenged and revenue entries enjoyed presumptive value under Section 133.

13 Jan 2020

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 24.10.2011 passed by the Depu...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition in Tenancy Act Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Limitation. Deputy Collector's Suo Motu Revision After 8 Years Without Notice Set Aside.

10 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Puranraj Ganpatraj Shah and others, filed a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court challenging the orders of the Dep...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)