Search Results for "Central Civil Services (CCA) Rules 1965"

43 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Jurisdiction of Internal Complaints Committee Under POSH Act in Cross-Departmental Complaint. Court Considers Whether ICC at Aggrieved Woman's Workplace Can Proceed Against Respondent Employed Elsewhere, Focusing on Statutory Definitions and Vishaka Guidelines.

The appeal arises out of a jurisdictional challenge by Dr. Sohail Malik, a 2010 batch Indian Revenue Service officer posted as OSD, Investigation, Cen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Ordnance Factory Labourer Seeking Full Salary for Suspension Period Following Acquittal — Period of Suspension Must Be Treated as Duty for All Purposes Under Fundamental Rule 54-B(3) When Acquittal Is Based on Full Trial on Merits.

The petitioner, Gopal S/o Sitaram Bairisal, a retired labourer from Ordnance Factory, Ambazari, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Cen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disciplinary Penalty Against Executive Engineer for Negligence in Rate Justification. Reduction in pay by one stage for one year with cumulative effect confirmed as proportionate penalty under Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965.

The petitioner, Shri B.M. Mittal, an Executive Engineer, challenged the judgment and order dated 30.9.2004 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Scientist Without Inquiry in Interest of Security of State. Dismissal under Article 311(2)(c) of Constitution and Rule 14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 Upheld as Procedural Safeguards Not Applicable Where Security of State is Involved.

The appellant, Dr. V.R. Sanal Kumar, was a Scientist/Engineer in the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (VSSC), a unit of the Indian Space Research Organisa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order Reinstating Suspended Police Officer Due to Non-Review Under Rule 3(8) of All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. Continued suspension beyond 90 days without mandatory review renders suspension illegal and without authority of law.

The State of Maharashtra and the Director General of Police filed a Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by CRPF Against Reinstatement of Constable Who Suppressed Criminal Antecedents. Termination Upheld as Respondent Willfully Concealed Pending Cases and Submitted Forged Documents.

The case involves an appeal by the Director General of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and others against a judgment of the Gauhati High Court...