Search Results for "Cadre Rules"

903 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 903 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Amendment to Co-operative Societies Rules. Petitioners Seek Declaration that G.O. Miscellaneous No.11 and Seniority List are Ultra Vires Constitution.

The matter comprised multiple writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Madras. The p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Amendment to Rule 7(3) and Seniority List in Co-operative Banks. Petitioners Seek Declaration that G.O. and Seniority List are Ultra Vires and Violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, employees of various District Central Co-operative Banks, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Teacher Promotion Case — C&V Teachers Not Entitled to TGT Quota for Headmaster Post. Rule 9(5) of Haryana School Education (Group C) State Cadre Service Rules, 2012 only gives notional conversion to TGT cadre, not eligibility for promotion against TGT quota.

The State of Haryana appealed against a Division Bench order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had allowed writ petitions filed by Sandeep Si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Reversion of Head Clerk to Senior Clerk. Reversion Upheld as Petitioner Was Junior to Respondent No. 5 and Appointment Was Subject to Seniority Determination Under Maharashtra University Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Khalil Ahamad Khan, was employed as a Senior Clerk at Amolakchand Mahavidyalaya, Yavatmal. He was promoted to Head Clerk on 01.06.2006...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Direct Recruit Section Officers' Seniority Over Promotees in Maharashtra Secretariat Service. Seniority to be determined from date of substantive appointment, not from date of ad-hoc promotion.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by direct recruit Section Officers and promotee Section Officers of the Maharashtra Secretariat Service, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010115872016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal's Order Quashing Promotions of Assistant Engineers. Promotions Made Without Following Recruitment Rules and Without MPSC Consultation Were Held Illegal.

The case involves multiple writ petitions challenging the judgment of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 11.9.2003 in Original Application ...