Search Results for "CGST"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "CGST"

274 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Order Disallowing ITC Due to Revised Timeline. Input Tax Credit claim under Section 16(4) of GST Enactments held not barred as time limit for filing return was subsequently revised.

5 Jun 2026

The petitioner, M/s.V.R.S & Co., a partnership firm represented by its partner V.Raja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows GST Refund Claim for Export of Services, Holds That Unjust Enrichment Provisions Do Not Apply When Tax Incidence Is Not Passed On to Any Person in India. The Court interpreted Section 54(8)(d) of CGST Act, 2017 and held that in case of export of services, the foreign client is not a 'person' for the purpose of unjust enrichment, and the refund cannot be rejected on that ground.

9 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Jar Productions Private Limited, is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013, engaged in providing production services to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows IGST Refund to Exporter Despite Initial Error in GST Return. Inadvertent Mistake in Invoice Number and Port Code in GSTR-1 Does Not Bar Refund of IGST on Zero-Rated Supply Under Section 16(3) of IGST Act, 2017.

27 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Sunlight Cable Industries, exported insulated cables to M/s. Khin Maung Tum & Brothers Co. Ltd., Myanmar, and paid Integrated Goods an...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Whether Petitioner is Entitled to Refund of Unutilized Input Tax Credit Under GST Laws. The Court Examines Whether the Petitioner Company Supplying Services to Foreign Group Companies Qualifies as an 'Agent' Under Section 2(5) of CGST Act.

16 Jun 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged two Orders-in-Appeal dated 10.08.2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Unutilized Input Tax Credit for Export of Services Under IGST Act — Rejects Revenue's Contention of Non-Compliance with Pre-Audit Requirement. The court held that rule 96(10) of CGST Rules applies only to refund of integrated tax paid on export, not to refund of unutilized input tax credit under section 54 of CGST Act.

8 Mar 2021

The petitioner, BA Continuum India Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in providing information technology and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention of Goods Under GST for Lack of Jurisdiction — Second Detention Without Proper Authorization Invalid. The court held that detention of goods under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 requires proper authorization and cannot be done without jurisdiction.

19 Aug 2020

The petitioner, a transporter registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...

High Court

High Court Quashes GST Registration Cancellation Order and Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration After Finding Violation of Natural Justice Principles

21 Jan 2026

The petitioner challenged the cancellation of its GST registration by the Superintendent, Range III, Ahmedabad through a show-cause notice dated 04.08...

High Court

downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985

5 Mar 2026

The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Writ Petition on Expiry of E-Way Bill for Exported Goods, Holds Penalty Under Section 129(1)(a) of CGST Act Not Imposable. The Court directed refund of penalty amount of Rs. 18,00,140/- as the issue was covered by Marcowagon Retail Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India.

23 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Balkrishna Industries Limited, filed a writ petition before the Gujarat High Court challenging orders dated 29.11.2025 and 02.12.2026 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in GST Refund Case — Satellite Derived 3D Model Services Held as 'Export of Services' Not OIDAR Services. Services of providing satellite derived 3D city models to a UAE client qualify as export of services under Section 2(6) of the IGST Act, 2017, and are not classifiable as Online Information Database Access or Retrieval (OIDAR) services under Section 2(17) of the IGST Act.

24 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Globolive 3D Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, entered into a Service Agreement dated 09 Septembe...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)