Search Results for "Building Bye-laws"

126 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in PIL Challenging Redevelopment Permissions in Heritage Precinct. Residents Allege Violation of Development Control Regulations and Arbitrary Administrative Actions by Municipal Authorities and Developer.

The matter before the Bombay High Court was a Public Interest Litigation filed by four residents of Carmichael Road, Mumbai, including Normandie Coope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Property Dispute Over Road Widening Compensation. Promise to Sanction Additional FSI Held Not Binding Without Consideration and Formal Approval.

The Thane Municipal Corporation (appellant) appealed against a judgment and decree dated 10.3.2005 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction in Construction Dispute. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred Under Section 488 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 for Suit Alleging Violation of Byelaws and Infringement of Civil Rights.

The petitioner, Satish Trivedi, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chandrapur, which decided a preliminar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Rejection of Counterclaim on Limitation Grounds. Court holds that limitation for counterclaim in arbitration under BSE Byelaws runs from date of filing of claim, not from accrual of cause of action.

The Petitioner, Hansraj Sohanlal Gouthi, HUF, through its Karta Ravi Gouthi, challenged an arbitral award dated 13 July 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Construction Dispute — No Sanction Order Existed, No Estoppel Against Corporation. Plaintiffs failed to prove deemed sanction under Section 264 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 as no formal order was passed and no notice of revocation was issued.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, owned plot nos. 71/72, 70/2 and 70/3 on Sheet No. 67-D at Amravati. They filed Regular Civil Suit No. 193 of 1988...