Search Results for "Bhatkar"

259 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 259 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellant convicted under Sections 302, 392, 397 IPC for killing a labourer and robbing him, with conviction affirmed on appeal.

The appellant, Dinesh @ Dhebarya Virendra Bhatkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, for the murder and robbery of Yellappa, a l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed. Accused's Act of Stabbing Deceased Multiple Times After Trivial Quarrel Does Not Fall Under Exception 4 of Section 300 IPC.

The appellant, Narsinh Arjun Jadhav, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Greater Bombay, for the murder of Rajesh Kanojiya under Section 302 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 498A and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Limbraj Patil, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of his wife Renuka under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workman's Appeal for Wages Under Section 17-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Employer's Challenge Dismissed. Court held that workman is entitled to last drawn wages during pendency of proceedings before Labour Court, irrespective of employer's financial hardship.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals (LPA 294/2010 and LPA 296/2010) arising from an order of a Single Judge dated 26.10.2010 in Writ Petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Defendants' Writ Petition in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Issues of Mundkarship and Tenancy Not Referable to Mamlatdar as They Are Not Substantial and Triable by Civil Court.

The case involves a suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the plaintiffs (respondents) against the defendants (petitioners) in respect of a p...