Search Results for "Better terms gratuity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Better terms gratuity"

138 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 138 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claims of Resigned Judicial Officers in Service Law Dispute. Resignation Does Not Forfeit Statutory Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Judicial Officers with Over 12 Years of Service.

25 Sep 2012

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by former judicial officers of the Maharashtra State Judicial Service. The petitioners, Jeevan Kashinat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Remand Order by Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Section 7(8) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Power to Remand; Appellate Authority Must Decide Appeal on Merits.

22 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Dr. Gajanan Vithoba Jain, a former employee of the respondent-management running Shiv Vaibhav College of Education, Wardha, filed an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Retired Bank Employee Challenging Discontinuation of Pension in Lieu of Gratuity — Pension Cannot Be Unilaterally Stopped Without Amendment to Service Regulations. The court held that pensionary benefits constitute a package and the bank could not discontinue the petitioner's pension without amending the service regulations, as the petitioner had a vested right to pension under the Pension Rules.

19 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Shapoor M. Mehta, an 87-year-old senior citizen, retired from Allahabad Bank on 30 May 1986 after 39 years of service as a Special Ass...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Forfeiture of Gratuity for Misconduct Involving Moral Turpitude Without Criminal Conviction — Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Does Not Require Conviction. The Court held that the disciplinary authority can determine whether the misconduct constitutes an offence involving moral turpitude, and forfeiture is permissible even without a criminal conviction.

26 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court considered three civil appeals arising from judgments of the High Courts that had set aside forfeiture of gratuity imposed on employ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Refers Questions on Applicability of Payment of Gratuity Act to Temples to Full Bench. Division Bench Finds Arguable Questions Whether Temple is 'Commercial Establishment' Under Karnataka Shops Act and Whether Prior Precedent on Temple Employee's Gratuity is Correct.

1 Aug 2019

The dispute arose when a former employee of Shri Mookambika Temple, Kollur, claimed gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 after his superan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Petitioners' Challenge to Controlling Authority Orders; Holds Payment of Gratuity Act Applies to Zilla Parishad Employees Despite Pension Rules. Section 14 Overrides Service Rules, and Zilla Parishad Employees Are Not Excluded Under Section 2(e) as They Are Not State Government Employees.

29 Apr 2025

Background: The writ petitions were filed by Zilla Parishad, Washim and its District Health Officer challenging orders of the Controlling Authority un...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Directs Re-adjudication of 21 Employees' Claims; Dispute on Interest and Bonus Under Winding-Up Not Resolved in Extracted Judgment Text. The court granted partial relief by allowing prayer (b) for re-adjudication of claims of 21 workmen due to discrepancies, while the final decision on prayer (a) concerning statutory interest, bonus, and provident fund contribution under the Companies Act, 1956 is not discernible from the incomplete text.

4 Aug 2006

The case concerns a company application filed by the Engineering Workers Association, representing 121 employees of M/s. Poysha Industrial Co. Ltd., w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Injury Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.15 Lakhs Enhanced to Rs.27 Lakhs for 70% Disabled Mechanical Engineer. Loss of Earning Capacity Reassessed with 50% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 14 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

22 Dec 2025

The appellant, Pratap Dandapani Padhi, a 43-year-old Mechanical Engineer working as a Foreman at Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited with a monthly s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Deduction for Retrenchment Compensation Reimbursed by Assessee to Subsidiary Under Contractual Agreement. The court held that retrenchment compensation paid by the subsidiary and reimbursed by the assessee under a contractual agreement is allowable as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it was incurred for commercial expediency and business reorganization.

26 Aug 2016

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 1980-81. The assessee, The Wall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Challenge to Exemption Notifications Under Section 23 of Maharashtra Private Security Guards Act. Comparison of Benefits Must Be Holistic, Not Item-by-Item, to Determine if Exemption Is Justified.

10 Oct 2006

The petitioner, Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi, a registered trade union representing private security guards, filed a writ petition challenging ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)