Search Results for "Bailee liability"

38 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 38 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR Against Witness in Land Dispute Case — No Prima Facie Case for Criminal Breach of Trust or Cheating. Witness's Role Limited to Signing Sale Deed Does Not Attract Criminal Liability Under Sections 406, 420, 423, 120-B IPC.

The present application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) for quashing of FIR being C.R. No.1-576 of 2007 reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Money Laundering and Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Loan Transaction and Dishonour of Cheques Do Not Attract Sections 406, 420 IPC or Sections 5, 33(3), 42 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

The present application was filed by the applicants (accused No.2 and another) under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Loan Dispute — Non-Repayment of Loan Does Not Constitute Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust Under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. Civil Nature of Dispute Leads to Quashing of Criminal Proceedings as Abuse of Process.

The applicant, Bhavinchandra Suryakant Purohit, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Purely Civil Nature of Dispute — Non-Payment of Dues Does Not Attract Criminal Breach of Trust Under Section 406 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and its office bearers against the order of the Allahabad High Court which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessees' Appeals in Interest Tax Dispute on Hire-Purchase Transactions. The interest component in hire-purchase instalments is not taxable under Section 2(7) of the Interest-Tax Act, 1974 as hire-purchase transactions are not loans or advances.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by M/s Muthoot Leasing and Finance Limited and other assessees, setting aside the judgment of the Kerala H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessees in Interest Tax Act Case on Hire-Purchase Instalments. Hire-purchase agreements are distinct from loans, and interest component in instalments is not taxable under Section 2(7) of the Interest-Tax Act, 1974, as it does not constitute interest on loans and advances.

The dispute involved a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax liability of non-banking finance and leasing companies under the Interest-Tax Act, 19...