Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

483 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 483 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Resolves Reference on Deposit Requirement for Revision Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - The court held that a litigant challenging only consequential actions pursuant to a recovery certificate under Section 101 is not required to deposit 50% of recoverable dues under Section 154(2A), as the mandate applies solely to challenges against the certificate itself.

4 Mar 2026

The judgment arose from a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay to resolve an irreconcilable conflict bet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Deposit 25% of Sale Price. Condition Precedent Under Rule 9(3) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Not Fulfilled, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Available.

23 Dec 2025

The petitioner, an individual aged about 70 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Adverse Observation in Bank's SARFAESI Application — Magistrate Cannot Make Observations on Validity of Proceedings Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. The Court held that the Magistrate's role under Section 14 is ministerial and not judicial, and any observations on the validity of the secured creditor's proceedings are without jurisdiction.

8 Sep 2025

The petitioner, State Bank of India, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad seeking to quash certain observations made by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Auction Sale of Mortgaged Property Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 — No Ground to Set Aside Sale After Certificate Issued and No Appeal Filed.

27 Feb 2023

The petitioners, Si2 Microsystems Pvt. Ltd. and its director Sanjay Vedaprakash Soni, availed a cash credit facility of Rs. 10 crores and a term loan ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.

25 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Secured Creditor's Priority Over Sales Tax Dues in MVAT Act Attachment Dispute. State Bank of India's mortgage charge on borrower's property held superior to VAT recovery under Section 32 of MVAT Act, 2002, following Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala ratio.

17 Dec 2020

The State Bank of India (SBI), a secured creditor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the attachment of a propert...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against SARFAESI Proceedings — Tenant's Claim Not Established. The court held that the appellant failed to prove tenancy and that the remedy under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act is available to any person aggrieved, including tenants.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, Modinasab Indikar, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa against the order of the District Magistrate, Salcete, d...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Alternative Remedy of Appeal Under Section 17(7) Available. Petitioners, as tenants of secured asset, cannot bypass statutory appellate remedy by invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.

8 Aug 2017

The petitioners, who were tenants of a property that was a secured asset of the respondent HDB Financial Services Ltd., filed securitisation applicati...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision in SARFAESI Act Suit — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Personal Guarantee Held Maintainable as It Does Not Relate to Enforcement of Security Interest Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act.

20 Jul 2017

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Allahabad Bank against an order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, rejecting t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Substitution of Assignee in Pending DRT Proceedings Under SARFAESI Act. Assignment of debt under Section 5 of SARFAESI Act entitles assignee to continue pending recovery proceedings without fresh filing, and amendment of cause title is permissible.

9 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Alpha and Omega Diagnostics India Ltd., challenged a common order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) which upheld the orde...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)