Search Results for "Articles 301"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Articles 301"

446 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 446 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Validity of Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets (Amendment) Act, 2019 — Petitions Challenging Levy of Market Fee on Commission Agents Dismissed. The Court held that the amendment expanding the definition of 'trader' to include commission agents and the imposition of market fee on them is within the legislative competence of the State and does not violate Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 301, or 304 of the Constitution.

19 Feb 2026

The petitioners, who are commission agents operating in various Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs) in Gujarat, challenged the constitution...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.2720 OF 2013

1 Oct 2014

The writ petitions were filed by municipal employee unions and individuals challenging the legality and constitutional validity of provisions of the B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Manufacturer for Refund of Octroi Duty on Imported Chemical Intermediate. Sulphonic Acid, a Raw Material for Detergents, Not Covered Under Entry 18 of Schedule H to the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 as It Is Not a Substance Used in Washing.

25 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Hindustan Lever Limited, a manufacturer of soaps and detergents, imported Sulphonic Acid, a toxic chemical intermediate used as raw ma...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Hotels and Restaurants. Sub-clauses (ZZZZV) and (ZZZZW) of Section 65(105) of Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2011 held to be within legislative competence of Parliament.

3 Nov 2014

The case involves three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court. The petitioners ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Clarification and Declares CGST Rule 31A(3) Ultra Vires in Favor of Turf Clubs. GST Liability on Betting Amount Limited to Commission Retained, Not Entire Totalisator Collection, Under CGST Act, 2017.

2 Jun 2021

The two writ petitions were filed by Bangalore Turf Club Limited and Mysore Race Club Limited, companies conducting horse racing and facilitating bett...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Defence Land Claim Over Leasehold Property. Petitioner's Title Not Established Against Union of India's Claim of Ownership Over Land Leased to Colaba Land & Mill Company.

19 Dec 2011

The petitioner, TCI Industries Limited, claimed to be a lessee of land admeasuring 10.264 acres in Colaba, Mumbai, by virtue of an Indenture of Assign...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of Pune Development Control Rules Allowing Municipal Takeover of Private Open Spaces for ₹1 Compensation. Petitioners Claim Violation of Right to Property under Article 300A and Lack of Statutory Basis in BPMC Act.

6 May 2026

Five writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 13.3.1.5 of the Development Control Rules ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Adjudicates Challenge to Declaration of Chandrapur as Dry District Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Order Dated 05.03.2015 and Section 139(1)(a) of the Act Challenged as Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

7 Jan 2016

This batch of writ petitions challenged the declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district. The petitioners, holders of licenses under the Maharashtra Pr...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Pre-Execution Challenge to Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA; Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Grounds for Interference are Limited to Five Exhaustive Grounds as per Gadia’s Case. Court Rejects Request to Allow Fresh Representation Under Section 11 When Prior Representation Already Rejected, Holding that It Cannot Direct Government to Review Its Decision.

5 Jan 2011

(1) Background: Three criminal writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of detention orders passed un...

High Court

KAHC010259352010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)