Search Results for "Article 320"

488 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 488 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Automobile Dealers Challenging Labour Court Awards of Back Wages and Reinstatement. Retrenchment of Workmen Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various automobile dealership companies (petitioners) challenging common awards passed by the Lab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Settlement and Divorce by Mutual Consent. The Court held that non-compoundable offences under Section 498A IPC can be quashed under Section 482 CrPC to secure the ends of justice when parties have genuinely settled.

The petitioner-husband filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 282/2012 re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Rejection of Amendment to Written Statement in Eviction Suit; No Due Diligence Shown After Commencement of Trial. Tenant's Application to Add Waiver Plea Based on Municipal Tax Payments Fails Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC as Knowledge of Tax Payments Existed Throughout.

The matter arose from a suit for eviction and mesne profits filed by the landlord against the tenant in the Small Causes Court at Mumbai. The landlord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State of Goa's Claim for Port Services as Admiralty Claim Against Vessel Sale Proceeds. Port Authority's Services to Vessel in Distress Constitute Maritime Claim with Priority Over Other Claims.

The plaintiff, State of Goa through Captain of Ports, filed an admiralty suit claiming recovery of Rs. 1,31,60,000/- for services rendered to the vess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...