Search Results for "Age relaxation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Age relaxation"

475 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 475 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by ECIL, Restores Single Judge Order Denying Age Relaxation to Outsourced Workers. Division Bench's Direction to Permit Participation in Selection Set Aside as Respondents Were Not Entitled to Age Relaxation Under Notification.

8 Mar 2019

The case involves an appeal by The Electronic Corporation of India Ltd. (ECIL) against a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicatur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Inclusion in Seniority List and Age Relaxation for Village Panchayat Employee Seeking Promotion to Zilla Parishad Post. Petitioner's name omitted from seniority list due to crossing age limit of 45 years, but court holds that delay by respondents cannot prejudice petitioner's rights under circular dated 06-04-2005.

17 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Ganesh Murlidhar Chaudhari, was appointed as a peon in the Village Panchayat at Nashirabad, Jalgaon on 1st April 1999 and had been ser...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Age Limit in Teacher Appointment Scheme and Sets Aside Continuance of Ineligible Appointee. The Court held that the upper age limit of 35 years under the Rehbar-e-Taleem scheme was mandatory to prevent arbitrariness under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, and age relaxation notifications apply prospectively only.

29 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the Rehbar-e-Taleem (Re-T) scheme launched by the State of Jammu and Kashmir on 28.04.2000 to address staff deficiencies in ele...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Age Limit of 35 Years for Judicial Officers in Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008. The court held that the 103rd Constitutional Amendment providing reservation for Economically Weaker Sections does not override the age limit prescribed for direct recruitment to judicial services.

23 Jan 2020

The petitioners, Krantikumar Kishanrao Kaulwar and Prashant Balaji Wattamwar, both advocates, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Minor Student's Admission to First Standard Despite Age Deficiency - Power of Relaxation of 15 Days by Head Master Upheld Under Government Resolution Dated 25 July 2019. The Court held that the Government Resolution dated 18 September 2020 did not take away the relaxation power, and the cut-off date extended to 15 January 2021, making the Petitioner eligible for admission.

23 Dec 2021

The Petitioner, a minor student aged 5 years, through his father, filed a writ petition seeking admission to the first standard for the academic year ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to MPSC's Refusal to Recommend Candidates for Teacher Posts Due to Age Bar — MPSC's Discretion to Prescribe Age Limit Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

21 Sep 2023

The State of Maharashtra and its education authorities filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MP...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Retirement Age of 60 Years Under MP Act - Petitioner Entitled to Superannuation at 60 Years as Per Regulation 7 of Chapter 10 of Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951

26 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Vinayak Jankiram Ingle, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 05.08.1963/16.08.1963 by the Chief Executive Officer, Buldana, and wo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Superannuation at 60 Years — Upholds Government's Refusal to Extend Service Age Based on Confidential Report Grades. Court holds that clause 11(4) of Government Resolution dated 05.03.2011 requiring minimum three 'A' and two 'B+' grades in preceding five years is mandatory and not arbitrary.

29 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Dr. Reeta Harode, a government employee, reached the age of 60 years on 31.10.2013. She sought extension of her superannuation age up ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to MAT Order Directing Age Relaxation for Dental Surgeons Under Maharashtra Recruitment Rules. Contractual Service Status Under National Health Mission and Applicability of Rule 3(b) of the Directorate of Health Service Recruitment Rules, 1990 Are Core Issues.

9 Jul 2026

The matter arose from a recruitment process for 189 Dental Surgeon posts initiated by the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) in 2015. The or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Clause 11(5) of GR Dated 5 March 2011 Requiring Two Public Advertisements Before Extension of Age of Superannuation for Principals in Non-Government Institutions. Condition is Valid and Non-Discriminatory After Corrigendum Dated 9 May 2014 Made It Uniformly Applicable to Government Institutions.

19 Jan 2016

The Bombay High Court disposed of a batch of writ petitions involving a challenge to clause 11(5) of the Government Resolution dated 5 March 2011, whi...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)