Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Retirement Age of 60 Years Under MP Act - Petitioner Entitled to Superannuation at 60 Years as Per Regulation 7 of Chapter 10 of Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 73
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vinayak Jankiram Ingle, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 05.08.1963/16.08.1963 by the Chief Executive Officer, Buldana, and worked in Government High School, Khamgaon until 28.02.1999. At the time of his appointment, the Vidarbha region was part of Madhya Pradesh, and the Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951 (MP Act) was applicable. Regulation 7 of Chapter 10 of the MP Act provided for a superannuation age of 60 years. After the reorganization of states on 01.05.1960, the MP Act continued to apply in Vidarbha until 01.01.1966. The petitioner completed two years of service on 16.08.1965 and became entitled to confirmation. Despite this, he was retired at the age of 58 years. He made a representation on 01.10.1997 seeking the benefit of the Supreme Court judgment in M.G. Pendke v. Municipal Council, Hinganghat, but was denied. The court held that the petitioner was governed by the MP Act and was entitled to the beneficial provision of retirement at 60 years. The petition was allowed, and the respondents were directed to treat the petitioner as having retired at 60 years and grant consequential benefits.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Age of Superannuation - Protection of Vested Rights - Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951, Regulation 7 of Chapter 10 - Petitioner, appointed as Assistant Teacher in 1963, was governed by the MP Act which provided retirement age of 60 years. Despite reorganization of states, the beneficial provision continued to apply. Held that the petitioner is entitled to retirement at 60 years and not 58 years (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, a teacher appointed in Vidarbha region when the Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951 was in force, is entitled to retirement at 60 years instead of 58 years.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to treat the petitioner as having retired at the age of 60 years and grant him all consequential benefits.

Law Points

  • Protection of vested rights under repealed statutes
  • Applicability of pre-reorganization service conditions
  • Age of superannuation for teachers in Vidarbha region
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (02) 133

Writ Petition No.1996/2000

2015-02-26

A. B. Chaudhari, P. R. Bora

Mr. P. B. Patil for petitioner, Mrs. N. P. Hiwase for respondent no.1, Mr. V. G. Wankhede for respondent no.3

Vinayak s/o Jankiram Ingle

The State of Maharashtra, The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Buldana, The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Buldana

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking declaration of retirement age as 60 years and consequential benefits.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that petitioner's age of retirement is 60 years with all consequential benefits.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was retired at 58 years despite being entitled to retirement at 60 years under the Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951.

Previous Decisions

Petitioner made representation on 01.10.1997 but was denied benefit of Supreme Court judgment in M.G. Pendke case.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to retirement at 60 years under the Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he was governed by the MP Act which provided retirement age of 60 years. Respondents opposed the petition, but the court found in favor of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioner, having been appointed when the Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951 was in force, is entitled to the beneficial provision of retirement at 60 years as per Regulation 7 of Chapter 10 of the said Act, which continued to apply until 01.01.1966.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner was obviously governed by the aforesaid provisions of the MP Act, 1951 all the more so because the Act continued to apply till 01.01.1966. The petitioner was, therefore, entitled to the said beneficial provision in the matter of age of his superannuation namely; 60 years and not 58 years.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Writ Petition No.1996/2000 in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench. Judgment reserved on 20.12.2014 and pronounced on 26.02.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951: Regulation 7 of Chapter 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition for Retirement Age of 60 Years Under MP Act - Petitioner Entitled to Superannuation at 60 Years as Per Regulation 7 of Chapter 10 of Madhya Pradesh Secondary Education Act, 1951
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver to Take Possession of Tenements for Redevelopment Despite Non-Signatory Members' Objection. Non-cooperating members bound by society's development agreement; Court Receiver...