Search Results for "proviso"

543 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 543 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Default Bail Computation Issue to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. The Court Examines Whether Date of Remand is Included or Excluded in Calculating 60/90-Day Period Under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for Entitlement to Default Bail.

The Supreme Court addressed a reference concerning the computation of the remand period for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Open Ballot Rule for Rajya Sabha Elections - Upholds Constitutionality of Rule 39-AA of Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 and Proviso to Section 33 of Representation of the People Act, 1951 Based on Proportional Representation and Party Discipline Principles.

The Supreme Court of India, in a judgment delivered by Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, dismissed a petition filed under Article 32 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Dispute Over Contractual Service Counting. Services Rendered as Casual/Contractual Cannot Be Treated as Temporary for Qualifying Service Under Rule 13 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Absent Statutory Scheme Provision.

The dispute arose from a claim for pensionary benefits by an employee who served as a casual/contractual General Assistant from 1985 until her regular...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Act Limitation Dispute Over Block Assessment. Limitation period for block assessment under Section 158BE commences from date of last Panchnama drawn, not date of last authorization, as per Explanation 2 to Section 158BE of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute arose from block assessment orders passed under the Income Tax Act, 1961, following search operations. The assessees challenged the assess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Finding. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act When Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation Due to Title Dispute.

The Supreme Court heard two appeals arising from a Delhi High Court order concerning land acquisition proceedings initiated in 1989-1992. The responde...