KAHC010085932008_1
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "presumption under Section 139"
832 result(s) found
Found 832 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Conviction in Non-Compoundable Offences Based on Settlement — Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC Can Be Exercised Even After Conviction, Subject to Guidelines. The Court Held That While Section 320 CrPC Restricts Compounding, Section 482 CrPC Provides Independent Power to Quash in the Interest of Justice, and Laid Down Guidelines for Such Exercise.
5 Jan 2021The judgment arises from a reference made to a larger bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve the contentious issue regarding the scope of power und...
- 94
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Appointment of Administrator for APMC Committee — Appointment of Administrator Without Prior Notice and Without Considering Representation Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that the power under Section 121 of the Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966 must be exercised in accordance with natural justice, and failure to issue show cause notice renders the appointment invalid.
13 Jun 2016The petitioners, who were the President, Vice President, and members of the Harihar Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), challenged the ap...
- 71
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 for Scheme Area.
11 Jul 2014The judgment is from the High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice Anand Byrareddy, dated 11th July 2014. It pertains to a batch of writ petit...
- 59
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.
10 Mar 2016Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...
- 92
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Election Petition Challenging Election of Returned Candidate from 140-Bagepalli Assembly Constituency on Grounds of Non-disclosure of Assets. Petition Filed Under Sections 80, 81, 100, 101 and 123 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, Alleges Suppression of Material Information in Nomination Affidavit.
16 Feb 2026The election petition was filed by Sri. C. Muniraju, an unsuccessful candidate of the Bharatiya Janata Party, challenging the election of Sri. S.N. Su...
- 61
High Court
- 88
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment in Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Jamma Malai Lands as Forest Land. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Conservator of Forests' Order Forfeiting Rights Under Section 82 of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963, Alleging Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Earlier Judicial Decrees.
17 Feb 2026The writ petition challenged the order dated 16.12.2011 passed by the Conservator of Forests, Kodagu, declaring the petitioners' Jamma Malai lands as ...
- 39
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Multiple Petitions for Arbitrator Appointment in BBMP Contract Disputes. Petitioners Seek Independent Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act for Claims Under Clause 10 of Agreement Dated 15.03.2007.
17 Mar 2015The matter involves multiple Civil Miscellaneous Petitions (CMP) filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitrati...
- 87
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 71
