KAHC010122492015_1
19 Jun 2023The writ appeal arises from an order dated 29.09.2015 passed by a Single Judge in W.P.No.42727/2013 (SC/ST) which dismissed the writ petition challeng...
Search Results for "land acquisition lapse"
662 result(s) found
Found 662 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Development Authority in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) as Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Following Constitution Bench Ruling in Indore Development Authority.
19 Apr 2023The dispute arose from a land acquisition matter where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquis...
- 458
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Does Not Lapse as Possession Was Taken, Applying Constitution Bench Interpretation That 'Or' in Section 24(2) Means 'Nor' or 'And', Overruling Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent.
13 Mar 2023The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition, declaring the acquisition deemed to have lapsed ...
- 425
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Following Constitution Bench Interpretation Overruling Earlier Precedent.
13 Mar 2023The dispute concerned a land acquisition matter where the Land Acquisition Collector and another appellant challenged the Delhi High Court's judgment ...
- 258
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Deemed Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Following Indore Development Authority Constitution Bench Ruling.
17 Feb 2023The dispute arose from a land acquisition matter where the Land and Building Department and Land Acquisition Collector appealed against a High Court j...
- 261
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Not Deemed Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Even Though Compensation Was Not Paid.
20 Jan 2023The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Delhi Development Authority against a judgment of the High Court of Delhi. The High Court had allowe...
- 177
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Following Overruling of Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent.
16 Jan 2023The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisit...
- 147
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government of NCT of Delhi's Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court's Declaration of Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Set Aside Due to Pendency of Proceedings Initiated by Landowners. The Court held that when possession could not be taken due to court orders obtained by landowners, the period of interim orders is excluded in computing five years for lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
2 Dec 2022The Government of NCT of Delhi appealed against the High Court of Delhi's judgment in Writ Petition (C) No. 2709 of 2015, which declared that land acq...
- 215
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — High Court's Declaration of Deemed Lapse Set Aside Due to Pendency of Proceedings Preventing Possession. The Court held that where possession could not be taken due to pending litigation initiated by landowners, the acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
2 Dec 2022The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declared that the ...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Landowners to Use Reserved Land for Adjacent Purposes After Lapse of Reservation Period Under MRTP Act. Reservation for shopping complex and vegetable market lapses due to non-acquisition within 10 years under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
30 Mar 2015The petitioners, landowners of Survey Nos. 405/1, 406/2, 407/2, 410/2 and 411 of Mouza Gondia (Bk), challenged the reservation No. S169 in the Final D...
- 131
