Search Results for "balance of convenience"

587 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 587 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37(2)(b) of Arbitration Act Against Arbitrator's Order Rejecting Interim Relief — Holds That Arbitrator Must Consider Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Before Refusing Interim Injunction.

The appellant, Spice Digital Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated 16...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining BCCI from Terminating IPL Franchise Agreement with Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited. Court Holds Termination Notice Invalid for Not Providing 30-Day Cure Period Under Clause 11.1 of Franchise Agreement.

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited (DCHL), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Franchisee in IPL Termination Dispute. Court restrains BCCI from terminating franchise agreement and issuing fresh tender pending arbitration, holding that prima facie case and balance of convenience favor the franchisee.

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. (DCHL), was the successful bidder for the Hyderabad franchise of the Indian Premier League (IPL) and en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition for Possession Against Tenant in Arbitration Dispute — Interim Relief Denied as Disputed Questions of Fact Require Trial

The petitioner, M/s. Gandhi Adhivitiya Combine, a developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Court Receiver Appointed to Protect Suit Premises Pending Trial. Dispute Involves Alleged Illegal Dispossession of Widow and Minor Son from Residential Flat and Office Premises by In-Laws.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan and her minor son Raghib Ibrahim Khan (appellants) against Asadullah Khan and others (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Film Release. Plaintiff Failed to Establish Sufficient Similarity Between His Story and the Film 'Jannat 2' to Restrain Its Release.

The appellant, Kapil Chopra, filed a suit against Kunal Deshmukh (director), Vishesh Films India Pvt. Ltd. (producer), and Fox Star Studios Private Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Civil Suit for Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Revisional Jurisdiction Under Section 115 CPC Cannot Be Exercised to Re-Appreciate Evidence When Findings Are Based on Appreciation of Oral and Documentary Evidence.

The present civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was filed by the original defendants (applicants herein)...