43994
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court heard criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Madras High Court dated 06.10.2007, which upheld convictions and senten...
Search Results for "Medical Age Certificate"
2602 result(s) found
Found 2602 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Considers State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and House Trespass Case. The Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Holding Victim Major and Sexual Act Consensual, Despite School Certificate Suggesting Minority.
27 Oct 2022The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the acquittal of the responde...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Reviews State Appeal Against Acquittal of Ten Accused in Murder and Rioting Case. Trial Court Had Acquitted Accused in Sessions Case No.140 of 2004 for Offences Under Sections 143, 147, 148, 302, 323, 504 r/w 149 IPC and Section 37(1) r/w 135 Bombay Police Act Due to Contradictions, Unexplained Delay in FIR, and Lack of Independent Witnesses.
12 Oct 2021Background: This criminal appeal arose from the acquittal of ten accused by the II Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, in Sessions Case No.140...
High Court
High Court Hears Reference for Confirmation of Death Sentence in Double Murder-Robbery Case. Conviction Under Sections 302, 307, 397, 452, 460 IPC for Fatally Attacking Housewife and Child During Robbery.
5 Nov 2019The case before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, arose out of a reference for confirmation of death sentence under Section 366 of...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal in Criminal Case Involving Conviction Under Sections 376, 392, 452, 506 IPC. Accused-Appellant Challenges Trial Court's Finding of Guilt for Rape of Two Women and Related Offences.
22 Jun 2018The matter is a criminal appeal arising from the judgment of the District Judge-1 and Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in Sessions Case No. 320 ...
- 44
High Court
High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 376(2)(f) of IPC. Appellant Contends That Evidence Only Proves Attempt to Rape, Not Penetration, Challenging Conviction for Rape of a Minor Below 12 Years.
21 Sep 2006The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant for the rape of a ten-year-old girl under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code. On Novembe...
- 48
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeals in Gang Rape Case; Convicts Challenge Conviction and State Seeks Enhancement of Sentence. Accused Were Convicted Under Sections 376(2)(g) and 366 IPC for Gang Rape of Two Minor Girls and Sentenced to 10 Years Rigorous Imprisonment.
21 Nov 2017Criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No. 121 of 1994 were taken up by the High Court of Judica...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.
19 Nov 2019The appellant, Sanjay s/o Anna Sose, was convicted by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana in Sessions Trial No.89/1998 for an offenc...
- 99
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Issues Comprehensive Directions for Release of Undertrial Prisoners in Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation — Systemic Overcrowding and Violation of Article 21 Rights Addressed. The Court held that the continued incarceration of undertrial prisoners beyond the maximum period of imprisonment for the offences they are charged with violates their fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution, and issued directions to ensure their release and prevent overcrowding.
1 Jan 2026The Supreme Court of India, in a writ petition filed by the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed ...
- 71
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Dowry Death Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient Despite Acquittal of Co-Accused. The Court held that the appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC for throttling his wife was based on complete chain of circumstances, and the acquittal of co-accused under Section 34 IPC does not affect the conviction.
6 Nov 2019The appellant, Javed Abdul Rajjaq Shaikh, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of his wife, Sultana. Th...
- 811
