High Court Hears Reference for Confirmation of Death Sentence in Double Murder-Robbery Case. Conviction Under Sections 302, 307, 397, 452, 460 IPC for Fatally Attacking Housewife and Child During Robbery.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 83
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, arose out of a reference for confirmation of death sentence under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and a criminal appeal against conviction. The prosecution case, as recorded by the trial court, was that on 30.07.2015, the two accused, Amir Ajaj Shaikh and Sachin Kundlik Raut, who were employed as air conditioner mechanics and known to the victim family, entered the house of Rupesh Bariya at Takiya Ward, Bhandara, with a common intention to commit robbery. Once inside, they attacked Rupesh’s wife, Priti, and their eight-year-old son, Bhavya, with a hammer. Priti sustained fatal injuries and was found lying in a pool of blood; Bhavya was also grievously injured. The accused ransacked the bedroom and stole cash, gold and silver ornaments, and other valuables. Rupesh returned home shortly after and discovered the scene. On a complaint, FIR No. 224 of 2015 was registered under Sections 307 and 452 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, later amended to include Section 302 upon Priti’s death. Investigation was taken over by the Local Crime Branch. The accused were already in custody in another case (Crime No. 223 of 2015) registered on the same day for an offence with a similar modus operandi. Their interrogations led to the recovery of the hammer, blood-stained clothes, cash of Rs. 1,73,000, and stolen jewellery. Fingerprint evidence from the scene, medical opinions confirming the hammer as the likely weapon, and DNA profiling further linked the accused to the crime. After completion of investigation, a charge-sheet was filed, and the case was committed to the Sessions Court at Bhandara as Sessions Trial No. 65 of 2015. On 30.06.2018, the learned Sessions Judge convicted both accused under Sections 302, 307, 397, 452, and 460 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. For the murder charge, the court awarded death sentence, directing that they be hanged by neck till dead. For the attempt to murder, life imprisonment and fine were imposed. For robbery and house trespass, varying terms of rigorous imprisonment and fines were ordered. Consequent to the death sentence, the trial court made a reference to the High Court for confirmation. The accused also filed Criminal Appeal No. 603 of 2018 challenging the conviction and sentence. Both the confirmation case and the appeal were heard together by a Division Bench comprising Justices P.N. Deshmukh and Pushpa V. Ganediwala. The State was represented by APP N.B. Jawade, while advocate O.W. Gupta appeared for the accused. The court reserved judgment on 30.08.2019 and pronounced it on 05.11.2019. The full text of the High Court’s reasoning and final order is not extracted in the provided excerpt, but the trial court’s findings and the proceedings up to the hearing are documented.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 IPC - The accused, in furtherance of common intention, committed murder of the housewife during robbery - The trial court convicted them and awarded death penalty, referring the matter to High Court for confirmation - Held by trial court that the death sentence was appropriate (Paras 1-2).

B) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 IPC - The accused also attempted to murder the minor son by inflicting head injuries - Conviction and life imprisonment imposed (Paras 1-2).

C) Criminal Law - Robbery and House Trespass - Sections 397, 452, 460 IPC - The accused committed robbery and house trespass by night with preparation to cause hurt - Conviction and rigorous imprisonment for varying terms (Paras 2).

D) Criminal Procedure - Confirmation of Death Sentence - Section 366 CrPC - A reference was made to the High Court as required under law for confirmation of death sentence (Paras 3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Propriety of death sentence and conviction of appellants under Sections 302, 307, 397, 452, 460 read with 34 IPC

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • murder
  • attempt to murder
  • robbery
  • house trespass
  • common intention
  • death sentence confirmation
  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 307 IPC
  • Section 397 IPC
  • Section 452 IPC
  • Section 460 IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
  • Section 366 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (11) 136

Criminal Confirmation Case No.4 of 2018 with Criminal Appeal No.603 of 2018

2019-11-05

P.N. Deshmukh, Pushpa V. Ganediwala

N.B. Jawade, O.W. Gupta, N.S. Khandewale

The State of Maharashtra (Confirmation Case), Amir Ajaj Shaikh, Sachin Kundlik Raut (Criminal Appeal)

Amir Ajaj Shaikh, Sachin Kundlik Raut (Confirmation Case), The State of Maharashtra (Criminal Appeal)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction and death sentence, and statutory confirmation of death sentence by High Court.

Remedy Sought

The accused sought acquittal from all charges, while the State sought confirmation of death sentence awarded by trial court.

Filing Reason

Conviction by trial court under Sections 302, 307, 397, 452, 460 read with 34 IPC and award of death penalty.

Previous Decisions

Sessions Court, Bhandara in Sessions Trial No.65 of 2015 convicted the accused on 30.06.2018 and sentenced them to death, life imprisonment, and rigorous imprisonment for respective offences.

Issues

Whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed murder, attempted murder, robbery, and house trespass in furtherance of common intention Whether the death penalty is justified and proportionate in the circumstances of the case

Judgment Excerpts

both the appellants, in furtherance of their common intention, committed house trespass to commit robbery in the house of PW-18 Rupesh s/o.Dayaji Bariya @ Patel they shall be hanged by neck till they are dead as contemplated under Section 354(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. the case of prosecution that, both the appellants, in furtherance of their common intention, committed house trespass to commit robbery

Procedural History

FIR No.224 of 2015 registered on 30.07.2015 under Sections 307, 452 r/w 34 IPC; investigation followed; accused arrested; charge-sheet filed; case committed to Sessions Court as ST No.65 of 2015; trial court convicted on 30.06.2018 and awarded death sentence; reference made to High Court u/s 366 CrPC; accused filed appeal; both heard together and judgment reserved on 30.08.2019, pronounced on 05.11.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 34, 302, 307, 397, 452, 460
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 354(5), 366, 428
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Obligation on Consignor and Consignee under Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 for Transport of Notified Goods. The Court held that Rule 89A(2) imposes a duty on the selling dealer to issue a written declaration and ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Probationer's Appeal in Civil Service Termination Case, Holding Discharge During Probation Not Removal or Dismissal Under Article 311(2). Rule 55-B of Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules Was Substantially...