Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

2105 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2105 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute — Maintainability Upheld as Dispute Not Between Landlord and Tenant. The Court distinguished the Supreme Court's ruling in Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil, holding that the bar on Letters Patent Appeals under Article 227 applies only to landlord-tenant disputes under the Rent Control Act, 1999.

28 Oct 2010

The appellant, Ramchandra Krushnarao Pitale, an 87-year-old pensioner, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment and order dated 15.6.2009 pa...

High Court

KAHC010022932010_1

11 Jul 2014

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, challengi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order Refusing Transfer of Company Petition. Chairman's Quasi-Judicial Order Held Amenable to Section 10F but Lacks Power to Transfer Part-Heard Matter or Constitute Special Bench.

30 Nov 2012

The appeal arose from an order of the Chairman, Company Law Board (CLB) rejecting an application to transfer a partly-heard company petition from the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.

11 Jul 2014

...

High Court

KAHC010069912016_1

10 Nov 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals as Not Maintainable: Order on Territorial Jurisdiction Not Appealable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act. The Court Holds That Orders Under Section 9-A CPC Are Not Enumerated in Order XLIII CPC or Section 37 Arbitration Act, Limiting Appeals in Commercial Disputes.

14 Sep 2017

The dispute arose out of two commercial suits filed before the Bombay High Court, where the plaintiffs claimed reliefs and the defendants raised preli...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Single Judge's Order Quashing Establishment of Three Road Transport Corporations. The Division Bench Describes the History of KSRTC but the Available Text Does Not Contain the Final Decision.

28 Aug 2013

The appeals arose from a common order of the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 22194 of 1997 dated 02.07.2007, which quashed orders and notifi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Batch of Writ Appeals Filed Under Karnataka High Court Act Against Single Judge Order in BDA Matter. The Court’s decision and specific legal findings are not provided in the extracted text.

26 Feb 2021

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, constituted by Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice N.S. Sanjay Gowda, heard a batch of writ appeals on 26th ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Writ Petition Seeking Lapse of Land Acquisition Under BDA Act; HSR Layout Scheme Fully Implemented, Acquisition Completed. Appellant's Claim for Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Rejected as Possession Taken and Third-Party Rights Created.

1 Dec 2020

The litigation arose from the acquisition of 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 146 of Agara Village for the formation of HSR Layout by the Bengaluru Develo...

26 27 28 29 30

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)