Search Results for "FIR inconsistency"

382 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 382 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Unexplained Delay. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 376(2)(l) IPC and Sections 4, 6, 10 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rajesh Murlidhar Lonbale, was convicted by the Special Judge under Sections 376(1), 376(2)(l) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Rape of 5-Year-Old Girl. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC Sustained Based on Direct Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Amir Nyamatkha Tadvi, was convicted by the 3rd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for the offence of rape under Section 376(2)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Life Imprisonment for Kidnapping and Attempt to Murder in POCSO Case — Conviction Based on Testimony of Minor Victim and Medical Evidence

The judgment arises from three appeals against the conviction and sentence of Osban Fernandes (A.1) and Ramesh Bagve (A.2) by the Children's Court at ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses LIC's Appeal on Stamp Duty for Insurance Policies in Rajasthan. State Has Legislative Competence Under Concurrent List to Collect Stamp Duty on Insurance Policies, But Relief Granted on Facts.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) against a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which upheld th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010822332025_1

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Promotions in Municipal Corporation Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Policy and Seniority Rules. The court held that promotions must follow the prescribed reservation policy and consider seniority, and directed reconsideration of promotions.

The petitioner, Narendra Barde, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the promotion of Respondent Nos. 2 an...